SkepticblogSkepticblog logo banner

top navigation:

Ghost in a Bottle

by Mark Edward, May 30 2009

 

kettleI recently went through one of my old mentalist catalogues from a company that specialized in mediumistic stunts and props and was reminded that such gimmickry as “Telephones to the Dead” are nothing new. The Robert Nelson catalogue I own is a treasured relic of a bygone era when magicians decided to cash in on the curiosity in the spiritualist trade that was on the wane, but still big enough news to get the attention of Houdini and other wonder workers. As a kid I spent hours pouring over every page. It took me many years to find out what exactly luminous paint, rubber hands and ectoplasm had to do with being a magician, but when I did I never looked back.  I was hooked. This stuff looked like the real thing! Ghosts were made to appear, tables floated and glowing faces appeared out of the dark – and all for under twenty dollars!  My ragged and dog-eared copy of this catalgue of wonders still survives. If the current spate of phonies touting their “Dead Telephones”  (or “DT’s” as I will refer to them from here on) want to get a lesson in how easy it was (and is) to convince the gullible that spirits can talk, Abbott’s “Enchanted Talking Tea Kettle”  was one act avalible for $300.00 that left audiences fully believing in the ability of the spirits to not only carry on conversations, but also accurately answer specific questions.

Chris Moon take note: Never mind having to use interpreted cold readings of blurry static and white noise to make a buck;  find yourself a Talking Tea Kettle and you can tell your clients exactly what they want to know without all that hard work!    

Back in the 1850’s, magicians wanted to get on the spirit bandwagon. After the fame of the Davenport Brothers and the Fox Sisters started such a money making brouhaha, savvy performers picked up the ball and ran with it . One such performer was David P. Abbott:

Before there were Cell Phones, ...or Frank's Box

Before there were Cell Phones, ...or Frank's Box

David Phelps Abbott

(1836 – 1934) was a magician, author and inventor who created such effects as the floating ball, later made famous by Okito. The best known of his books is Behind the Scenes With the Mediums  (1907), considered by many to be one of the best exposures of the methods used by psychics of that era. Abbott invented the “Enchanted Talking Tea Kettle.”  Houdini later revealed the trick behind this kettle in one of his expose magazine articles showing how a special radio was built into the tea kettle. By putting the spout of the kettle to your ear someone in another room would whisper a message to the listener. Sound familiar? I actually like this nostalgic gaff better than “Frank’s Box” or the other ghost hunting toys currently making the rounds such as the latest: “Ovilus.”  But who am I among so many? Is one really more ridiculous than the other?  An act is an act.

tomb_mereruka_statueAncient Egyptian temples were built using optical illusions and had specially created tubes and vents that allowed voices like “the man behind the curtain” in “The Wizard of Oz”  to give out proclamations to the assembled masses, convincingly showing the reality of invisible gods. Statues talked freely and no one gave it a second thought back then.  According to ancient texts, these cult statues could nod their heads and talk. The reality was that priests secretly pulled strings to make the head move, spoke for the god by throwing their voices, or (like Mr. Moon and his contemporaries) represented their own words as the deity’s. Whatever the illusion employed, the statues were regularly consulted for their opinions on a variety of personal problems; one ancient record even credited a statue with solving a crime. According to a papyrus in the British Museum, cult statues even served as judges in courts of law!

Pedro, Senor Wences and ...his box

Pedro, Senor Wences and ...his box

Sound familiar? Is it surprising that such antics are still venerated in our supposedly advanced scientific society? Ventriloquists could be making a fortune giving readings. In fact, why bother with any artifice or prop of any kind? If people are incredibibly ignorant they will listen to a guy sitting in front of a broken radio, why not  just cut to the chase and put a frigging sock puppet on your hand and say you are channeling Senor Wences? Aspiring mediums wouldn’t have to pretend to have a disembodied head in a box like Wences did with his masterful creation, Pedro. Just put a sock on your hand and go for it! This would be much more entertaining, to the point and also pave the way for that all-important child demographic to begin to accept mediumship in a form that makes much more sense than Oprah or fancy electronic apparatus. So Chris Moon, Sylvia Browne, John Edward, James VanPraagh and all the rest of you talkers to the dead: why don’t you put a sock on it ….or better still: put a sock in it.

A Handy Spirit Guide

A Handy Spirit Guide

Yesterday I received an interesting echo to all this from fellow magician Willem in South Africa. He sent this in to my Yahoogroup PSI-LIGHT. I will transcribe it with a little help with his English:

I’m a new member of PSI-LIGHT living in South-Africa and have been interested in magick for a long time. There is this witchdoctor here that uses a small bottle that has a lot of beads around it so you can not see inside it. This guy uses this bottle to answer any questions. This little bottle makes a sound like a mouse that only he understands. He does not touch the bottle on the table so all the sound is made while this little bottle stands on the table. I asked him to sell me this bottle but he did not want to. I asked him what was in the bottle and he said it is a tokkolos. What do you think?”

I replied with my own theory:
Ventriloquism (obvious) or how about something like a plate lifter bulb under the bottle, tablecloth, table that makes sounds like you said? Of course, I would have to see this guy in action, but I doubt it’s much more than a simple noisemaker cleverly concealed. What does this demon say? The “beads” around the bottle make me wonder what’s hidden. How big is the bottle? How big is the mouth of the bottle? Is it stoppered closed or open?

He wrote back:

This little mystery of the spirit in the bottle is very old. I shall ask the sangoma (witchdoctor) if  I can take a photo. I have been living in South Africa my whole live and this is the first time that I have seen this little bottle.I asked the sangoma what was in the bottle and he said it is a tokkolos this is a spirit.He said that they make these spirits from roots and plants that they use and that some of these spirits are bigger then other. The bottle they use is made of a small pumpkin that is decorated with small white and red beads.I was wondering if he used some kind of pk …Sadly  I don’t know how he did it but I could use many of the magic methods if I wanted to. Ghost in machine coming to mind. THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE :)”

Safrica, a Modern Day African Witchdoctor

Safrica, a Modern Day African Witchdoctor

I won’t go into the actual modus that this witchdoctor may be using, but I seriously doubt it’s a spirit made of roots and plants. That stuff never works. BTW: a “pk” refers to a “psycho-kinetic magnet” which is hidden under the table in a shoe or manipulated by a clever handling to make things move or stop watches ala Uri. The not-so-mysterious powers of magnetism are responsible for myriads of magical effects and the use of this scientific principle is universal. We can plainly see by Willem’s query that no matter how low or high tech we want to go, where there is a will there is always a way for witchdoctors, mediums or “researchers into EVP” to make a buck off of the unwary, uneducated and the gullible. The truth is out there and it’s called SCIENCE.  Willem’s last line tells it all. We could indeed use a magician’s trick methods if we wanted to. …Some do.

By the time this blog is posted, I will have talked my way through another radio pod cast on the paranormal. GHOST DIVAS will have had me as a guest and another session will soon be booked on The Paranormal Podcast. There’s a whole network devoted to the strange and the weird: The Supernatural Radio Network, which features “paranormal talk nightly.”  Maybe I’m in the wrong business? No…  …No, Brian and Ryan save me. I’m not going there. I’m talking common sense to the believers. The fight must go on. Somebody has to have a brain and be able to use it.

FYI: If anyone is interested in joining my Egroup; PSI-LIGHT, simply go to Yahoogroups.com, search for PSI-LIGHT and sign up. Tell me in the subscription box that you are part of the skeptical movement and I will immediately approve your membership. PSI-LIGHT is an international group of magicians, bizarrists and otherwise semi-social outcasts who specialize in story telling, seances, magic of the mind and generally doing weird things.  There’s tons of material in the PSI-LIGHT archives for the seeker of secrets.

SSSShhhhhhhh, it’s a sceret.

14 Responses to “Ghost in a Bottle”

  1. Mr Stu dislikes WOO! says:

    Great blog Mark! Very informative. The “talking” tea kettle is fantastic! Perhaps I can get some sort of “Cappuccino Machine to the Dead” or “Mr. Coffee to the Dead” scheme going… oh wait, some one already jumped on that band wagon:
    http : //www.coffeepotghost.com

  2. TonyaK says:

    Like all of those before, once the Telephone to the Dead loses favor, or gets boring, there will just be another “magical” device to take its place. Unfortunately, people will always turn to something tangible in an attempt to validate their beliefs. Or pad their pocketbook with a bit o’ the green. Or maybe a bit of both.

    The same night you appeared on Ghost Divas Live, Chris Moon had a podcast. I listened, and was incredibly frustrated by the bunk he was liberally squirting all over the audience. My favorite quote had to be, “I was a staunch supporter of the scientific method but the box (Frank’s Box, I guess) made me rethink my ways.” He also stated that he is one of only 30 people who can successfully operate the device. I asked him where he got this information. You guessed it. From the Telephone to the Dead itself. Apparently, it is a self-validating device. I repeatedly tried to cajole him into testing his claims via a third party and was again met with excuses.

    Your appearances on the paranormal podcasts have been very well done. The unquestioning believers out there need to have more exposure to rational thought, without a doubt!

  3. I have a kettle at home sitting around gathering dust. Ebay, here I come!

    I put the kettle spout to my ear swore I could hear the ocean. I took a peek inside and was startled to find it dry and completely empty. These magical devices never cease to amaze me.

    I’m sold. I’ll take two.

  4. For some reason this reminds me of a stupid trick I like to do in the kitchen. I take a hot pan and throw in a piece of ham or Canadian Bacon and then press it hard with a spatula. As the steam escapes it whines and screams and I tell everyone that I have haunted ham!

  5. Dax says:

    My brother is an amateur mentalist and show hypnotist (*), and it is sometimes just eerie how he can use cues and a basic understanding of human psychology to force a person to select a specific number, item, whatever. I guess I need to team up with him, kill both our consciences (why, why, why can’t I just be an immoral, selfish, and rich fraud?), and make good money claiming we have mystic powers.

    (*) Our secret? Show hypnosis is actually kinda fake: you actually abuse the person’s ability to delude him or herself to conform with what is expected. It’s just strange psychology.

  6. llewelly says:

    I recently went through one of my old mentalist catalogues from a company that specialized in mediumistic stunts and props and was reminded that such gimmickry as “Telephones to the Dead” are nothing new.

    Telephones? Telephones? Today’s youth want to know about sexting the dead, especially the sexting of virile vampires.

  7. Paul T. says:

    Nice blog Mark, when I was around 13 or 14 I built for myself a talking coffee can based on the same principles of simple inductive radio. I would do this cheesy Colombian voice saying that I was the spirit of some long gone coffee picker and my spirit was trapped in this can. In my years of researching this subject I came across a 1922 article from Popular Radio and fortunately the page is still archived on the web here’s the link http://earlyradiohistory.us/1922hou.htm in it Houdini explains how mediums use inductive radio techniques to make not only teapots speak but also spirit trumpets or séance trumpets. It’s well worth the read.

    Another very rare electrical appliance for tapping into the great river of the dead, is a device known as William B. Lamont Spirit Telegraph, the backroom company was started sometime in the middle 50s we only know that it went bust somewhere around 1957. Nothing about this device could be more basic it was two D-cell batteries hooked to a telegraph key to initiate the spark for the telegraph key to strike there are two metal disks facing each other and of course the telegraph key will not strike unless there is something conductive introduced to complete the circuit. According to the inventor that substance was ectoplasm, a mysterious ( and I’m guessing conductive) material produced when spirits manifest themselves. The telegraph was intended to be used during séances when the spirit appears the presence of ectoplasm would cause the telegraph key to strike. According to the hand written manual the spirit can be trained to answer yes or no questions. I won’t go into the other inaccuracies of the manual here.

    Recently some of these devices resurfaced it’s very odd that the person who has the website treats this as new find, in my heyday of collecting antique photographs the complete history of the Spirit Telegraph hung out there like some kind of urban legend. Here is a link to that site http://www.mortlakemagic.com/spirit.htm since I have so much research material I’ve been encouraged recently by many to put together a book on the history of spirit communication via electronic means, and to also try to put to rest some urban legends about Thomas Edison’s alleged involvement in building a machine to talk to the dead. But my wife says I cannot do this until she finishes her book on what it is like to live with a skeptic.

    • TonyaK says:

      Paul, I totally think you should write that book! :)

      • Paul T. says:

        Thinks Tanya, I’m getting close I really am I have one other project to finish first. I’m thinking of starting the book in the Victorian era.

      • Richard Smith says:

        If you write it, may I suggest “The Radio of Spirit” as a title?

      • Paul T. says:

        Correction thank you Tonya not Tanya I don’t even know who the hell that is! Nice title suggestion thank you.

  8. Richard Smith says:

    I thought the article was okay, until I saw the picture of Senor Wences and Pedro. Then I thought to myself, ‘s’aright.