SkepticblogSkepticblog logo banner

top navigation:

Logicon 2011 Keynote Available Now
“The Reasonableness of Weird Things”

by Daniel Loxton, Jul 01 2011
Daniel Loxton Keynote Address at LogiCON 2011. Photo by Mark Iocchelli

Go to video for Daniel Loxton's Keynote Address at LogiCON 2011. (Photo by Mark Iocchelli)

I’m pleased to announce (on Canada Day, donchaknow!) the release of my 2011 Keynote speech from Edmonton’s LogiCon, in both audio and video formats. The audio version is presented on the Canadian broadcast radio program Skeptically Speaking (preceded by my conversation with host Desiree Schell). The video version (handheld video, in four parts) appears courtesy of the Greater Edmonton Skeptics Society (the hosts of LogiCon).

It’s a very personal speech, which uses my own life and family as an illustration of its theme: “While every human deserves scientific literacy, it’s not something we’re born with. It’s something we must be taught.”

A Seamless Continuation

Scientific skepticism turns a critical eye on paranormal and fringe science claims, so it’s usually framed by narratives of tension or conflict (as X-Files audiences will recall): either the stubborn, reductive skeptic versus the open-minded, intuitive believer; or, the responsible, science-based thinker versus the foolish kook.

But I have been both, and my experience did not fit into that story of conflict.

I was a believer in everything (a Fox Mulder if ever there was one!) who eventually became a “professional skeptic.” And yet, my life as a skeptical investigator is a seamless continuation from my paranormal enthusiasm: from inquisitive nerd with a passion for weird mysteries, to inquisitive nerd with a passion for weird mysteries. Nothing changed, except the information I had to work with.

As a young paranormal enthusiast, I was very fortunate to discover forthright, honest, kind voices for skepticism: in particular, the work of Barry Beyerstein and Carl Sagan. Sagan and Beyerstein are both gone now, both lost to us too soon. But they had time to speak to people like me with respect and kindness, and with something of value to offer: “Want to see something really cool?”

Thanks to Sagan and others, I learned that science embraces deep mystery. This is the story of how my universe came to look much, much bigger, and how I was taught the value of scientific skepticism—a skepticism that does not scoff, but discovers.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)
Logicon 2011 Keynote Available Now
“The Reasonableness of Weird Things”
, 5.0 out of 5 based on 5 ratings

Like Daniel Loxton’s work? Read more in the pages of Skeptic magazine. Subscribe today in print or digitally!

Recommended Reading

3 Responses to “Logicon 2011 Keynote Available Now
“The Reasonableness of Weird Things”

  1. David Glück says:

    Wonderful talk, Daniel. Thanks! I had a similar Damascus moment when I found my first “Skeptical Inquirer The Zetetic” on a book store news stand back in 1980. I found it thrilling to learn about how full of it I was. I still find it thrilling, although I may be a little less full of it now.

  2. Trimegistus says:

    Let’s all be honest here: weird stuff, even when it’s dead wrong (ESPECIALLY when it’s dead wrong) is a lot of fun. One reason I follow a lot of skeptical Web sites is that they point me at new and wondrously loopy forms of crackpot nonsense I might otherwise miss.

    Let’s also be honest about skeptics. While most of us, I think, are interested in science and believe that truth and accuracy are important, there is a significant subset who do simply enjoy it as a way to feel intellectually superior.

    Both types have much more overlap with the crackpots and believers than we care to admit. Paranormal or pseudoscience believers obviously love the weird stuff, too. And a lot of them have a brittle, aggressive sense of intellectual superiority. Sound familiar?

  3. tmac57 says:

    I just finished listening to the Skeptically Speaking podcast,Daniel,and I really enjoyed both the interview,and your talk.I like your approach to skeptical outreach,and I believe that it can be effective for reaching people like myself who like you,in my teens bought in to psychics,UFO’s,and various other “interesting” phenomena.Keep up the good work.