This past episode, “Blazing Horizon/Rollover”(1.5), for example, featured the “Paulding Light,” a supposedly mysterious glow that can be seen in Michigan, but which locals know are merely headlights from a nearby highway:
pauldinglight.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=paulding&action=display&thread=4

The previous episode, “Predator/Red Sky at Night” (1.4), “investigated” the “Beast of Dartmoor,” which has long been identified as an area Newfoundland:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-472909/Thats-Beast-Dartmoor–pet-dog.html

A particularly inventive episode, “Unwanted Visitors/Strange Sightings” (1.2), featured two eerie figures that were most likely egrets caught on a grainy infrared camera:
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/46833/Strange_Alien_Figures_Caught_CCTV_California_2007/

In each case, the rational explanation would have made for good television. But instead, the crew often briefly considers it, makes of it a strawman, then dismisses it. To explain the purported footage of the “Beast of Dartmoor,” for example, they compared video of a clearly unsuitable breed of dog wandering amiably towards its trainer, rather than a large hairy dog running full-tilt.

If you are in the US, you can judge for yourself. The episodes are all on Hulu:
http://www.hulu.com/fact-or-faked-paranormal-files

I don’t have time or energy to appropriately campaign against this schlock, but I hope someone will.

-Disappointed

epic “scientist” label fail for hip little bill.

on my boob-tube provider’s lineup, there is a channel devoted to documentaries.

perhaps the “actual” skeptologists (and not their eye-candy, would-be dopplegangers) would consider doing a doc instead of a series, if not both?

is the “science” channel an option or are they owned by the same company that shills mindless paranormal crap to the masses?