<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sailing Directly Downwind… Faster Than the Wind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aircargk</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-73113</link>
		<dc:creator>Aircargk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-73113</guid>
		<description>If you understand sailing, than you know that you can sail cross wind faster than the wind speed.  If you understand sails than you understand that a wind, a sail and a prop blade are conceptually the same for the purpose of sailing (and efficient propeller blade in simple terms is a wid,  A wing is a more efficient sail (the advent and of wingsail for high performance sailing is ample evidence of this.)  The vehicle is traveling downwind, but the sail is traveling crosswind at a near 45 degree ang to the wind direction (given the blade andle and the speed of the vehicle.  The blade (sail!!!) is thus traveling in what sailors call apparent wind, and thus can travel many times faster than the wind.  The only necessary element is for the wind to spin the prop with enough torque to overcome drag.  Yes it will go much faster than the wind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you understand sailing, than you know that you can sail cross wind faster than the wind speed.  If you understand sails than you understand that a wind, a sail and a prop blade are conceptually the same for the purpose of sailing (and efficient propeller blade in simple terms is a wid,  A wing is a more efficient sail (the advent and of wingsail for high performance sailing is ample evidence of this.)  The vehicle is traveling downwind, but the sail is traveling crosswind at a near 45 degree ang to the wind direction (given the blade andle and the speed of the vehicle.  The blade (sail!!!) is thus traveling in what sailors call apparent wind, and thus can travel many times faster than the wind.  The only necessary element is for the wind to spin the prop with enough torque to overcome drag.  Yes it will go much faster than the wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-55329</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-55329</guid>
		<description>I feel like there have to be practical marine applications for this.  But the physics of marine vehicles is complicated....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like there have to be practical marine applications for this.  But the physics of marine vehicles is complicated&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timo</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-55005</link>
		<dc:creator>Timo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-55005</guid>
		<description>Could this work on a sailboat or is friction caused by water too high? Instead of wheels have propellers at the water and instead of sail a propeller. How about using induction AC engine and generator so no direct connection between the two? Too much losses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this work on a sailboat or is friction caused by water too high? Instead of wheels have propellers at the water and instead of sail a propeller. How about using induction AC engine and generator so no direct connection between the two? Too much losses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-45767</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-45767</guid>
		<description>I had the pleasure of meeting Rick and Rob at an AIAA presentation in Mountain View California last Thursday.

You can see a review of the event at http://open4energy.com

Look to the right - article is titled Downwind Faster Than the Wind

Not only is it possible, but I had my hands on a model of the principle - working on a treadmill - actually going faster than the belt.

As I wrote: I began to understand better - how something could go directly downwind faster than the wind - when I realized that the question was not about wind speed, but rather one of conversion of kinetic energy potential. In this case using a propeller to convert the energy potential in a volume of air moving at a speed (wind) into a force that could be applied to wheels.

I do hope that some of our readers will look further and see the potential for energy efficiency - and think about energy saving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the pleasure of meeting Rick and Rob at an AIAA presentation in Mountain View California last Thursday.</p>
<p>You can see a review of the event at <a href="http://open4energy.com" rel="nofollow">http://open4energy.com</a></p>
<p>Look to the right &#8211; article is titled Downwind Faster Than the Wind</p>
<p>Not only is it possible, but I had my hands on a model of the principle &#8211; working on a treadmill &#8211; actually going faster than the belt.</p>
<p>As I wrote: I began to understand better &#8211; how something could go directly downwind faster than the wind &#8211; when I realized that the question was not about wind speed, but rather one of conversion of kinetic energy potential. In this case using a propeller to convert the energy potential in a volume of air moving at a speed (wind) into a force that could be applied to wheels.</p>
<p>I do hope that some of our readers will look further and see the potential for energy efficiency &#8211; and think about energy saving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spork</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-30913</link>
		<dc:creator>spork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-30913</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Very nice hoax.

Yes, kind of like the moon landing hoax.  What a hoot!

&gt;&gt;So, if you can go faster than the wind then this should operate just fine on a calm day.

I have no doubt that wind powered vehicles work just fine on calm days - in your world.  In ours - not so much.

&gt;&gt; what are you getting out of all this work?  Very lame.

Ahhh - you&#039;re worried we&#039;re working to hard for nothing.  That&#039;s sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Very nice hoax.</p>
<p>Yes, kind of like the moon landing hoax.  What a hoot!</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;So, if you can go faster than the wind then this should operate just fine on a calm day.</p>
<p>I have no doubt that wind powered vehicles work just fine on calm days &#8211; in your world.  In ours &#8211; not so much.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; what are you getting out of all this work?  Very lame.</p>
<p>Ahhh &#8211; you&#8217;re worried we&#8217;re working to hard for nothing.  That&#8217;s sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-30882</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-30882</guid>
		<description>HaHaHa says: &quot;So, if you can go faster than the wind then this should operate just fine on a calm day.&quot;

No 

HaHaHa says: &quot;Just give it a push and start the propeller, from then on you have a head wind just like your faster than the wind situation.&quot;

No true wind -&gt; apparent headwind = ground speed at the wheels. 

This not same as downwind faster than the wind where

apparent headwind &lt; ground speed at the wheels.

HaHaHa says: &quot;Very lame&quot;

Actually it is very cool, because it makes overzealous skeptics who argue against it look foolish. It demonstrates that many of the internet skeptics are not much better at physics than actual crackpots, and argue from pure intuition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HaHaHa says: &#8220;So, if you can go faster than the wind then this should operate just fine on a calm day.&#8221;</p>
<p>No </p>
<p>HaHaHa says: &#8220;Just give it a push and start the propeller, from then on you have a head wind just like your faster than the wind situation.&#8221;</p>
<p>No true wind -&gt; apparent headwind = ground speed at the wheels. </p>
<p>This not same as downwind faster than the wind where</p>
<p>apparent headwind &lt; ground speed at the wheels.</p>
<p>HaHaHa says: &quot;Very lame&quot;</p>
<p>Actually it is very cool, because it makes overzealous skeptics who argue against it look foolish. It demonstrates that many of the internet skeptics are not much better at physics than actual crackpots, and argue from pure intuition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HaHaHa</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-30636</link>
		<dc:creator>HaHaHa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-30636</guid>
		<description>Very nice hoax. Seems like a lot of work for a laugh.

So, if you can go faster than the wind then this should operate just fine on a calm day. Just give it a push and start the propeller, from then on you have a head wind just like your faster than the wind situation.

Again, what are you getting out of all this work? 

Very lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice hoax. Seems like a lot of work for a laugh.</p>
<p>So, if you can go faster than the wind then this should operate just fine on a calm day. Just give it a push and start the propeller, from then on you have a head wind just like your faster than the wind situation.</p>
<p>Again, what are you getting out of all this work? </p>
<p>Very lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Nurk</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-30009</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Nurk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-30009</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my guess:

Three phases:
1. Slower than wind speed (relative wind coming from behind)
2. At wind speed (no relative wind)
3. Faster than wind speed (relative wind from in front)

1. At first, the prop is acting like a sail on a boat running downwind - the wind pushes on it, and moves the vehicle forward. Because the vehicle moves forward, the wheels turn the prop, actually increasing forward speed a fraction. As the cart gets faster, the prop moves faster, and is actually beginning to propel the cart. The faster the cart goes, the greater effect the prop has as a propelling force.
So to start with, the wind pushes the cart forward, but then the turning wheels drive the prop, which then pulls the cart forward. The wind is needed here to offset the inefficiency. At this stage the wheels are driving the prop, which then pulls the cart forward, helped by a pushing wind, until it reaches wind speed.

2. When the cart is going the same speed as the wind, then the wind is no longer pushing. However, the wheels are spinning at say 15mph. This drives the prop. The prop is then like an aircraft standing still, and it will pull the cart forward through the apparently still air - just like an aircraft can move forward from rest. The propulsion is supplied by the momentum of the wheels only at this point. If the cart is light enough, and the ratio worked out nicely, then the cart continues to accelerate. This is only possible because of the wind - creating a no airspeed yet fast groundspeed situation that allows the wheels to drive the prop.
In this stage, the wheels are driving the prop, and it is the prop that is providing the forward acceleration. This phase only lasts a short while until...

3. Once there is a headwind, then the prop stops acting as the propulsion, and instead acts as a windmill. The wind moves the prop, which then turns the wheels. More forward speed = more apparent wind to windmill the prop to drive the wheels = more forward speed. And the whole thing happily accelerates until it reaches its efficiency limits.

The cool thing about this is how the prop and wheels interact. At first the prop is being pushed, then it&#039;s the wheels driving the prop, then the wind driving the prop that then drives the wheels.

The amazing thing is they got the ratio, efficiency, and managed to get it rolling in the first place.

Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my guess:</p>
<p>Three phases:<br />
1. Slower than wind speed (relative wind coming from behind)<br />
2. At wind speed (no relative wind)<br />
3. Faster than wind speed (relative wind from in front)</p>
<p>1. At first, the prop is acting like a sail on a boat running downwind &#8211; the wind pushes on it, and moves the vehicle forward. Because the vehicle moves forward, the wheels turn the prop, actually increasing forward speed a fraction. As the cart gets faster, the prop moves faster, and is actually beginning to propel the cart. The faster the cart goes, the greater effect the prop has as a propelling force.<br />
So to start with, the wind pushes the cart forward, but then the turning wheels drive the prop, which then pulls the cart forward. The wind is needed here to offset the inefficiency. At this stage the wheels are driving the prop, which then pulls the cart forward, helped by a pushing wind, until it reaches wind speed.</p>
<p>2. When the cart is going the same speed as the wind, then the wind is no longer pushing. However, the wheels are spinning at say 15mph. This drives the prop. The prop is then like an aircraft standing still, and it will pull the cart forward through the apparently still air &#8211; just like an aircraft can move forward from rest. The propulsion is supplied by the momentum of the wheels only at this point. If the cart is light enough, and the ratio worked out nicely, then the cart continues to accelerate. This is only possible because of the wind &#8211; creating a no airspeed yet fast groundspeed situation that allows the wheels to drive the prop.<br />
In this stage, the wheels are driving the prop, and it is the prop that is providing the forward acceleration. This phase only lasts a short while until&#8230;</p>
<p>3. Once there is a headwind, then the prop stops acting as the propulsion, and instead acts as a windmill. The wind moves the prop, which then turns the wheels. More forward speed = more apparent wind to windmill the prop to drive the wheels = more forward speed. And the whole thing happily accelerates until it reaches its efficiency limits.</p>
<p>The cool thing about this is how the prop and wheels interact. At first the prop is being pushed, then it&#8217;s the wheels driving the prop, then the wind driving the prop that then drives the wheels.</p>
<p>The amazing thing is they got the ratio, efficiency, and managed to get it rolling in the first place.</p>
<p>Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-29024</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-29024</guid>
		<description>Hello is this on? Good explanation(s) and so many post(s).

The answer is gear ratio between propeller and wheels, meaning they&#039;re trading torque (weight of the car) for velocity.

Yes, thank you, I now, I&#039;m exceptional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello is this on? Good explanation(s) and so many post(s).</p>
<p>The answer is gear ratio between propeller and wheels, meaning they&#8217;re trading torque (weight of the car) for velocity.</p>
<p>Yes, thank you, I now, I&#8217;m exceptional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/05/27/sailing-directly-downwind%e2%80%a6-faster-than-the-wind/#comment-27321</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=8353#comment-27321</guid>
		<description>OK, think of it like this. you have a sail machine. The wind pushes you and you start moving. It will push you up until you are the speed of the wind.
Now hook a generator to the wheels and you generate power. Now use that power, to push back against the wind. You have the wind pushing you, and you are pushing back against it using the power generated by turning the wheels.
And this is not a perpetual motion machine because, power from the wheel is linear, but speed generated from it is not so you can go the speed of the wind-loss for friction + speed from wheel power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, think of it like this. you have a sail machine. The wind pushes you and you start moving. It will push you up until you are the speed of the wind.<br />
Now hook a generator to the wheels and you generate power. Now use that power, to push back against the wind. You have the wind pushing you, and you are pushing back against it using the power generated by turning the wheels.<br />
And this is not a perpetual motion machine because, power from the wheel is linear, but speed generated from it is not so you can go the speed of the wind-loss for friction + speed from wheel power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

