<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Skeptics&#8217; Guide to the Universe&#8221; podcast fails utterly; crumbles under own incompetence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Dunning</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-21556</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Dunning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-21556</guid>
		<description>Anita rightly calls attention to the opening sequence in Here Be Dragons, where I said &quot;Here are some examples of woo,&quot; then showed pictures of a lot of products without further information or context. I am the first to admit this was badly done. I answered some of the specific questions about some of the products on the Here Be Dragons FAQ page: http://herebedragonsmovie.com/faq.php

I did not mention the &quot;organic soybeans&quot; or &quot;organic ketchup&quot; on that page specifically. There is nothing wrong with soybeans or ketchup, organic or otherwise. The woo I was referring to was the belief that &quot;organic&quot; versions carry some magical extra benefit lacking in the regular versions. Nothing in the video made this point clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anita rightly calls attention to the opening sequence in Here Be Dragons, where I said &#8220;Here are some examples of woo,&#8221; then showed pictures of a lot of products without further information or context. I am the first to admit this was badly done. I answered some of the specific questions about some of the products on the Here Be Dragons FAQ page: <a href="http://herebedragonsmovie.com/faq.php" rel="nofollow">http://herebedragonsmovie.com/faq.php</a></p>
<p>I did not mention the &#8220;organic soybeans&#8221; or &#8220;organic ketchup&#8221; on that page specifically. There is nothing wrong with soybeans or ketchup, organic or otherwise. The woo I was referring to was the belief that &#8220;organic&#8221; versions carry some magical extra benefit lacking in the regular versions. Nothing in the video made this point clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-21436</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-21436</guid>
		<description>I for one can&#039;t get enough of bad accents, there is nothing better than to get a face full of stereotypical accent of some place in the world, be it India, Australia, or Good Old Boy Souther(my favorite).

There should be more accents thrown around not less, truly brings a smile to me to listen to my favorite shows and someone lets out a good old fashion bad accent. Keep up the great work people, bad accents bring job this one human.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one can&#8217;t get enough of bad accents, there is nothing better than to get a face full of stereotypical accent of some place in the world, be it India, Australia, or Good Old Boy Souther(my favorite).</p>
<p>There should be more accents thrown around not less, truly brings a smile to me to listen to my favorite shows and someone lets out a good old fashion bad accent. Keep up the great work people, bad accents bring job this one human.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-21179</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 03:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-21179</guid>
		<description>In case you haven&#039;t noticed, Brian started this thread by calling out the SGU on its blunder.
If you want to see a top skeptic catch a lot of flack, read Michael Shermer&#039;s threads here.
It&#039;s important to keep skeptics honest, and also to give them credit when they put in extra effort to be honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you haven&#8217;t noticed, Brian started this thread by calling out the SGU on its blunder.<br />
If you want to see a top skeptic catch a lot of flack, read Michael Shermer&#8217;s threads here.<br />
It&#8217;s important to keep skeptics honest, and also to give them credit when they put in extra effort to be honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Ikonen</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-21173</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Ikonen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 17:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-21173</guid>
		<description>Regardless of the knowledge Brian Dunning may have, I disagree with the way his documentary portrays chemistry and nutrition in a way that will easily be misinterpreted by the average audience into distancing from these important sciences. I regret if I am sometimes the first to note when a Skeptic that has been given prominence is at fault. There appears to be an elitism among the skeptical community, awarding its top skeptics some extent of immunity from scrutiny and enhanced tolerance toward blunders. 

I am not one to follow suit, perhaps enabled by some of the rejection I meet in the skeptical community due to my investigation into my own paranormal claim, but then perhaps such distancing can serve useful and add objectivity as well as honesty into my observations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of the knowledge Brian Dunning may have, I disagree with the way his documentary portrays chemistry and nutrition in a way that will easily be misinterpreted by the average audience into distancing from these important sciences. I regret if I am sometimes the first to note when a Skeptic that has been given prominence is at fault. There appears to be an elitism among the skeptical community, awarding its top skeptics some extent of immunity from scrutiny and enhanced tolerance toward blunders. </p>
<p>I am not one to follow suit, perhaps enabled by some of the rejection I meet in the skeptical community due to my investigation into my own paranormal claim, but then perhaps such distancing can serve useful and add objectivity as well as honesty into my observations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vito</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-21033</link>
		<dc:creator>Vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 02:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-21033</guid>
		<description>Still not as bad as Desire Jennings&#039; (Who claimed to get dystonia from the H1N1 vaccine) fake accent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still not as bad as Desire Jennings&#8217; (Who claimed to get dystonia from the H1N1 vaccine) fake accent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walleye</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-21021</link>
		<dc:creator>Walleye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 18:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-21021</guid>
		<description>How hard must one squeeze the fish in order to extract the fish oil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How hard must one squeeze the fish in order to extract the fish oil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larian LeQuella</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-21013</link>
		<dc:creator>Larian LeQuella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-21013</guid>
		<description>Without the P.S. I knew this was an &quot;in all good fun&quot; type of post.  Sadly, I am convinced that people who are not skeptical, or are too literal, just don&#039;t have a sense of humour.  Mayhaps that is why it&#039;s so easy to Poe fundies and the like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without the P.S. I knew this was an &#8220;in all good fun&#8221; type of post.  Sadly, I am convinced that people who are not skeptical, or are too literal, just don&#8217;t have a sense of humour.  Mayhaps that is why it&#8217;s so easy to Poe fundies and the like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-21009</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-21009</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s Brian&#039;s take on fish oil
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4114

&quot;Fish oil is a great source of omega-3 fatty acids, and these have been shown many times to have certain cardiovascular benefits. The American Heart Association recommends that you eat fish at least twice a week.
Where the pseudoscience invades is in the area of supplementation — basically fish oil pills...&quot;

Does that sound like he thinks fish oil is woo woo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s Brian&#8217;s take on fish oil<br />
<a href="http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4114" rel="nofollow">http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4114</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Fish oil is a great source of omega-3 fatty acids, and these have been shown many times to have certain cardiovascular benefits. The American Heart Association recommends that you eat fish at least twice a week.<br />
Where the pseudoscience invades is in the area of supplementation — basically fish oil pills&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Does that sound like he thinks fish oil is woo woo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Ikonen</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-21007</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Ikonen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 05:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-21007</guid>
		<description>Well why should anyone make fun of Brian&#039;s accents when they should be 
ridiculing his spreading of the pseudoscience that nutrition be woo. 

In his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiZNMxpUS1g&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here Be Dragons&lt;/a&gt;, he puts &quot;Modern Day Dragons&quot; such as psychic readers, ghosts, and superstitions, right next to the Woo Woo of &quot;chemistry&quot;, such as the entirely supernatural fish oil, vitamin C, St. John&#039;s Wort, soybean powder, and pesticide free &quot;organic&quot; ketchup. The woo of these so called &quot;molecules&quot; he finds comparable to homeopathy, which is the absence of molecules. 

Brian Dunning. Has a free weekly audio podcast. Dedicated to furthering knowledge of the widespread pseudosciences that infect popular culture. Such as the woo woo that there be these mythological and totally unproven by science &quot;molecules&quot;, and how these allegedly are used by the body in such things as &quot;the immune system&quot; or &quot;nutrition&quot;. Woo woo at its best. Just like the non-existence of bacteria, and all other little things Middle Age man and Brian Dunning not see with their eyes.  

By profession Brian Dunning is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptoid.com/about.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;computer scientist, both as a Silicon Valley CTO and as a consulting engineer&lt;/a&gt;. How about that Freshman chemistry Brian? You clearly make an error by classifying nutrition in the same category as true woo, and perhaps we should all light a candle, take a moment of silence, join hands, and let this embarrassing skeptical blunder of a man remind us that just because we  call ourselves a critical thinker, it does not grant instant wisdom in the sciences in which we have no education. 

You can say it in any accent you wish, but vitamin C continues to offer its electron and support the immune system, fish oil continues to feed our body, and soybean powder still contains the amino acids, yes Brian, even though it is not made from meat. 

The quality of Brian&#039;s musings of critical thinking, does remind us of this other critical thinker, who, like Brian, looked at the world through the eyes of just a man, thinking critically, and sharing his wisdom with the rest of the world, although in a perfectly genuine &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sanplNTr6c&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Australian accent&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well why should anyone make fun of Brian&#8217;s accents when they should be<br />
ridiculing his spreading of the pseudoscience that nutrition be woo. </p>
<p>In his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiZNMxpUS1g" rel="nofollow">Here Be Dragons</a>, he puts &#8220;Modern Day Dragons&#8221; such as psychic readers, ghosts, and superstitions, right next to the Woo Woo of &#8220;chemistry&#8221;, such as the entirely supernatural fish oil, vitamin C, St. John&#8217;s Wort, soybean powder, and pesticide free &#8220;organic&#8221; ketchup. The woo of these so called &#8220;molecules&#8221; he finds comparable to homeopathy, which is the absence of molecules. </p>
<p>Brian Dunning. Has a free weekly audio podcast. Dedicated to furthering knowledge of the widespread pseudosciences that infect popular culture. Such as the woo woo that there be these mythological and totally unproven by science &#8220;molecules&#8221;, and how these allegedly are used by the body in such things as &#8220;the immune system&#8221; or &#8220;nutrition&#8221;. Woo woo at its best. Just like the non-existence of bacteria, and all other little things Middle Age man and Brian Dunning not see with their eyes.  </p>
<p>By profession Brian Dunning is a <a href="http://skeptoid.com/about.php" rel="nofollow">computer scientist, both as a Silicon Valley CTO and as a consulting engineer</a>. How about that Freshman chemistry Brian? You clearly make an error by classifying nutrition in the same category as true woo, and perhaps we should all light a candle, take a moment of silence, join hands, and let this embarrassing skeptical blunder of a man remind us that just because we  call ourselves a critical thinker, it does not grant instant wisdom in the sciences in which we have no education. </p>
<p>You can say it in any accent you wish, but vitamin C continues to offer its electron and support the immune system, fish oil continues to feed our body, and soybean powder still contains the amino acids, yes Brian, even though it is not made from meat. </p>
<p>The quality of Brian&#8217;s musings of critical thinking, does remind us of this other critical thinker, who, like Brian, looked at the world through the eyes of just a man, thinking critically, and sharing his wisdom with the rest of the world, although in a perfectly genuine <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sanplNTr6c" rel="nofollow">Australian accent</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robo Sapien</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2010/04/29/skeptics-guide-to-the-universe-podcast-fails/#comment-20995</link>
		<dc:creator>Robo Sapien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 16:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=7881#comment-20995</guid>
		<description>He is Billie Mays reincarnated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is Billie Mays reincarnated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

