Anyone is welcome to visit my Facebook page, or is invited to get to know me in my personal form, to see that I am not the person as portrayed by these Skeptics who run out of dirt against the claim itself, and who then resort to tactics such as a personal defamation campaign based on false allegations and misinterpretation of character.

But do be reminded, skepticism is a cousin of science, and cases are not won by the most libelously creative or aggressively persuasive, but facts stand alone and impersonally. The point is, even if I were the most flirtateous or sexually manipulative individual in all of the world, that would be entirely beside the point. And fortunately I am not such a person, so we can please all just focus on the claim itself, without these absurd diversions that arise from these men’s own personal fantasies, which I am not to be held responsible for, and which hold no weight against the claim.

Please leave my personal life out of this. The claim can be evaluated on its own, and my personal life neither supports nor discredits it.

You later publicly accused me of sexually harassing you and lied when you said you were an innocent victim.”

Mr. Carr how appropriately you twist things to appear in your favor. I was engaging in skeptical discussions with you, and YOU were the one who begun flirting with me. What was it that you said something about college girls? You then also asked me to send you topless pictures of me, which I declined, especially since you are a married man with two children.

I did say those things, but why would you omit the things that you said? I was also merely teasing you. If I were truly flirting, you would have material you could not post publicly.

Also I do not regard you as a Skeptic. You are just a man with personal opinions, and an agenda, picking on the one science student who is investigating an interesting experience of medical perception, rather than you going after the truly harmful woo who charge people money and ask for people to believe in their powers. I do none of such things, I am merely investigating.

And when you run out of “stuff” to use against the claims in a truly skeptical manner, you then turn to personal slander such as of a sexual nature, you have deliberately tried to make me say things and tried to provoke me into behavior that I do not do, only so that you could find material against the claim.

You later publicly accused me of sexually harassing you and lied when you said you were an innocent victim.

oops, forgot to address that statement…

i don’t think so.

although i do have a hard time with the idea of any serious skeptic being gullible when it comes to “woo” wiles, i suppose the idea of male skeptics being susceptible to feminine wiles is pretty much a gender given.

which “relationship” with which skeptic?

it sounds like you’ve tried a few.

And if you think I would be flirting with Skeptics to try to “win them over”, trust me I can flirt better than that and you would know it if I did.

somehow i don’t doubt that you can “flirt even better” and would do so if it would help your p$ychic $tudie$.

I do think people are misinterpreting me.

for some reason anita reminds me of someone named beatrice that i’ve run across online in the past…

not being psychic myself, i’m just picking up on some nuance of manipulation in the choice of verbiage.

And if you think I would be flirting with Skeptics to try to “win them over”, trust me I can flirt better than that and you would know it if I did. I do think people are misinterpreting me.