<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Junior Skeptic Goes Rogue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cabbo</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14957</link>
		<dc:creator>Cabbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14957</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a topic for you: santa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a topic for you: santa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beelzebud</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14944</link>
		<dc:creator>Beelzebud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14944</guid>
		<description>Yeah well he&#039;s listed as &quot;skeptic&quot; on the site, and his first column is just a gushing love letter to Ayn Rand.   Maybe his title there should be Objectivist, because the last time I checked Ayn Rand and her philosophy isn&#039;t in any way a universal viewpoint among skeptics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah well he&#8217;s listed as &#8220;skeptic&#8221; on the site, and his first column is just a gushing love letter to Ayn Rand.   Maybe his title there should be Objectivist, because the last time I checked Ayn Rand and her philosophy isn&#8217;t in any way a universal viewpoint among skeptics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14918</link>
		<dc:creator>Rand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14918</guid>
		<description>Regarding Ayn Rand, when I was subscribed to THE OBJECTIVIST, I found it anything but &quot;objective&quot;.  I&#039;ve read 3 books by Rand and enjoyed 2, finding ATLAS SHRUGGED tedious and sententious.  

While I agree with much of Rand and Libertarianism, I&#039;ve not found one advocate who could argue that The Clean Air Act and The G.I. Bill weren&#039;t phenomenally successful from an economic and social vantage, and I remain a utilitarian with reasoned compassion.  So I don&#039;t think one need buy Rand whole hog as she claimed, but we would be foolish not to understand the egoistic nature of men (Rand recycled Hume really) in seeking solutions economically and socially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Ayn Rand, when I was subscribed to THE OBJECTIVIST, I found it anything but &#8220;objective&#8221;.  I&#8217;ve read 3 books by Rand and enjoyed 2, finding ATLAS SHRUGGED tedious and sententious.  </p>
<p>While I agree with much of Rand and Libertarianism, I&#8217;ve not found one advocate who could argue that The Clean Air Act and The G.I. Bill weren&#8217;t phenomenally successful from an economic and social vantage, and I remain a utilitarian with reasoned compassion.  So I don&#8217;t think one need buy Rand whole hog as she claimed, but we would be foolish not to understand the egoistic nature of men (Rand recycled Hume really) in seeking solutions economically and socially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenn</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14895</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14895</guid>
		<description>How disappointing. 

I was passed over for Pope, then president and now this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How disappointing. </p>
<p>I was passed over for Pope, then president and now this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halincoh</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14891</link>
		<dc:creator>halincoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14891</guid>
		<description>I know this has nothing to do with this post , but I just wanted to say that I just finished the SCIENCE of GOOD and EVIL and thought it to be excellent. Job well done sir!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this has nothing to do with this post , but I just wanted to say that I just finished the SCIENCE of GOOD and EVIL and thought it to be excellent. Job well done sir!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14890</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14890</guid>
		<description>Well the Ayn Rand article was secondary, a sort of passing plug for himself as a side note.  The main purpose of this post seems to be welcoming the new guy.  

Ayn Rand was awesome though and so was Mr. Shermer&#039;s article.  Rock on Shermer, rock on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the Ayn Rand article was secondary, a sort of passing plug for himself as a side note.  The main purpose of this post seems to be welcoming the new guy.  </p>
<p>Ayn Rand was awesome though and so was Mr. Shermer&#8217;s article.  Rock on Shermer, rock on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14887</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14887</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t have to be skeptical there.
CFI blogs cover politics, ethics, and religion, but I guess CFI competes with Michael Shermer&#039;s Skeptics Society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t have to be skeptical there.<br />
CFI blogs cover politics, ethics, and religion, but I guess CFI competes with Michael Shermer&#8217;s Skeptics Society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beelzebud</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14886</link>
		<dc:creator>Beelzebud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14886</guid>
		<description>How is an article drooling all over Ayn Rand at all skeptical about anything?  At least there is one thing good about it.  It wasn&#039;t posted here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is an article drooling all over Ayn Rand at all skeptical about anything?  At least there is one thing good about it.  It wasn&#8217;t posted here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuffgong</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14885</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuffgong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14885</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard some good arguments against Loxton so, stop me if you&#039;ve heard this, but color me skeptical.  We shall see what he produces as I&#039;ve largely passed Junior Skeptic by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard some good arguments against Loxton so, stop me if you&#8217;ve heard this, but color me skeptical.  We shall see what he produces as I&#8217;ve largely passed Junior Skeptic by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/11/17/junior-skeptic-goes-rogue/#comment-14881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=5126#comment-14881</guid>
		<description>Trueslant article was awesome.  Rock on Shermer, rock on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trueslant article was awesome.  Rock on Shermer, rock on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

