Comments on: Connie’s Maddie Madness http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/ The official blog of the Skeptologists Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: paraskept http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-12973 paraskept Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:25:28 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-12973 Mark sounds like she's a very delusional individual,personally can not stand any of them that take advantage of missing people in order to further their own name- as one thats been through the nightmare of having a missing loved one, I can most assuredly tell you that a psychics so called help, really hurts, in ways that I can not even begin to describe- I can only pray that Connie get that medical attention she so obviously needs Mark sounds like she’s a very delusional individual,personally can not stand any of them that take advantage of missing people in order to further their own name- as one thats been through the nightmare of having a missing loved one, I can most assuredly tell you that a psychics so called help, really hurts, in ways that I can not even begin to describe- I can only pray that Connie get that medical attention she so obviously needs

]]> By: N Baker http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-12657 N Baker Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:08:26 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-12657 I watch Ms. Sonne during the Challenge, and again during the press conference immediately afterwards. My take was that she seemed to be a nice person, but delusional. Now I think she is very delusional, and disturbed. And not nice. I watch Ms. Sonne during the Challenge, and again during the press conference immediately afterwards. My take was that she seemed to be a nice person, but delusional.

Now I think she is very delusional, and disturbed. And not nice.

]]> By: connie sonne http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-11984 connie sonne Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:24:34 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-11984 Mark, did`nt you forget something?? You hav`nt mentioned the recorded voices I gave you. Three reasons: You can`t get it work, because you did`nt do what I told you to do. You are afraid, maybe for loosing your job as several more than you??? AND THE THIRD REASON: you ARE a big liar, which I told you !!! Connie Mark, did`nt you forget something?? You hav`nt mentioned the recorded voices I gave you.

Three reasons:

You can`t get it work, because you did`nt do what I told you to do.

You are afraid, maybe for loosing your job as several more than you???

AND THE THIRD REASON: you ARE a big liar, which I told you !!!

Connie

]]> By: Mark Edward http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-11355 Mark Edward Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:47:13 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-11355 I'd say she's NOT getting away with it. She's not gettin away with anything and that's the point. The more she does this sort of press baiting without any track record or stats to back her up, the more of a nut case she becomes in the minds of the people who waste their time listening to her. I for one don't plan to make Connie and her fantasies any sort of "project" at this point. Now, if she ends up in a landfill as suggested or covered in gold paint ala Goldfinger, ...well, then, ...maybe I'll take another look. For now it's bye bye Connie. I’d say she’s NOT getting away with it. She’s not gettin away with anything and that’s the point. The more she does this sort of press baiting without any track record or stats to back her up, the more of a nut case she becomes in the minds of the people who waste their time listening to her. I for one don’t plan to make Connie and her fantasies any sort of “project” at this point. Now, if she ends up in a landfill as suggested or covered in gold paint ala Goldfinger, …well, then, …maybe I’ll take another look. For now it’s bye bye Connie.

]]> By: Susan Gerbic http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-11340 Susan Gerbic Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:36:39 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-11340 You hit the nail right on the head! You hit the nail right on the head!

]]> By: Bryan http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-11320 Bryan Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:12:45 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-11320 I would say that this is as much "proof" of this being the little girl as any blurry Bigfoot or U.F.O. photograph. It is sad that someone can get away with this and hurt the people who are involved in cases like this. I would say that this is as much “proof” of this being the little girl as any blurry Bigfoot or U.F.O. photograph. It is sad that someone can get away with this and hurt the people who are involved in cases like this.

]]> By: Karl Withakay http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-11310 Karl Withakay Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:57:07 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-11310 The concept that such a massive, evil conspiracy would somehow leave her free to expose it reminds me of the original OJ criminal trial defense. We were told by the defense that OJ was a victim of a large, well organized frame up conspiracy executed by an incompetent group of officers incapable of properly investigating a crime scene or gathering evidence: Makes sense.....Not! The concept that such a massive, evil conspiracy would somehow leave her free to expose it reminds me of the original OJ criminal trial defense. We were told by the defense that OJ was a victim of a large, well organized frame up conspiracy executed by an incompetent group of officers incapable of properly investigating a crime scene or gathering evidence: Makes sense…..Not!

]]> By: MadScientist http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-11269 MadScientist Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:22:11 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-11269 What's the point - she can only pay in welfare stamps anyway. More money would be lost suing her than would be lost because of anything she says. What’s the point – she can only pay in welfare stamps anyway. More money would be lost suing her than would be lost because of anything she says.

]]> By: tmac57 http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-11264 tmac57 Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:19:15 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-11264 "What Connie and all the other wack-jobs out there are doing to capitalize on her is sick." Thats what really irks me about this. That a deluded/lying 'psychic' would spout a bunch of nonsense is old news. But to incorporate and exploit the disappearance of a child into her fantasy/scam is particularly low. But sadly, this is also 'old news'. “What Connie and all the other wack-jobs out there are doing to capitalize on her is sick.”
Thats what really irks me about this. That a deluded/lying ‘psychic’ would spout a bunch of nonsense is old news. But to incorporate and exploit the disappearance of a child into her fantasy/scam is particularly low. But sadly, this is also ‘old news’.

]]> By: Carl http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/08/15/connies-maddie-madness/#comment-11261 Carl Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:26:24 +0000 http://skepticblog.org/?p=3836#comment-11261 Er, Ms. Sonne, not Sonnes. Er, Ms. Sonne, not Sonnes.

]]>