Comments on: ?eb ecneicsitna nac yfoog woH

By: Peggy Kane

Peggy Kane — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:06:59 +0000

Excuse me Sam, I don’t think I can be considered a troll here.
Did you forget the article to which I’ve responded?
And I quote:
“deep fog of nonsense”
“comical noises”.
“illogic goes on forever”.
“The Pulpit Of Nonsense”
“Paul McCartney is actually Bigfoot”
“the hilarity that is the EVP Reverse Speaking website”
“Now, I hate to make fun of people, but”
“just making stuff up”
“reverse speech is really, really silly”
“this stuff is truly well and remarkably ridiculous”
“incomprehensible gobbledygook”

Note also, the cute and hilarious pictures of Phil

So don’t call me a troll here. I’m only putting up a defense for myself and others who study this field. That’s it.

I originally was reversing James Randi, who attacks many viciously under the guise of being a “skeptic”. Phil was just a sidebar.

But I take your point.

I’ve put in enough time here and will now leave and let everyone go back to their own beliefs.

Good luck in your journey, and to all of those here including Phil.

May I make a teeny suggestion though? Maybe you need to have your ears checked.

By: Sam

Sam — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:52:36 +0000

I went to this latest article of yours. As usual the same story. Unclear noises which you claim are clear reversals.
Example:
I-agree-saves-this-planet

What i hear: i dont hear the word ‘save’. It might even be ‘shares’. But i wont claim it as it is too unclear.
‘Planet’. I dont hear that either. It might be ‘plummet’ or even ‘punnet’. Once again too unclear so not worth guessing for me.

I cant be bothered to show all the exmaples.
I am arguing with someone who is like a religious fanatic.
But many of your other reversals under that article are unclear also.

By: Sam

Sam — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:45:42 +0000

Peggy,
Why are you behaving like a troll here?
You have any decency, make your point and go away.
The RS cant speak clearly and yet somehow the broken words are some gospel of truth?
It is worse than being a religious fanatic.
You are angry with Phil because he (like many) cant hear in RS what you claim you can. Clearly it is prone to subjective interpretation.
In the world of conspiracy, would anyone be stupid enough to listen to noises which might be manipulated (unclear is bad enough)?
You likely steal other peoples information and then twist it and then lie that you heard it in RS.
How many times your predictions failed? What a nerve you have calling other people disinfo agents when your own work is possibly even worse than theirs?
You did create a convenient escape plan after repeated failures. ‘Time is a manipulation’.
Dont talk about ego please. You are one of the biggest ego maniacs i have ever seen. You want to go on a drive by, attacking anyone and anything in your quest to appear like you are the only human on earth that knows the truth. You stole David Oates creation and then call him a disinfo agent. You insult other RS people who dont get what you do. You are very indecent on many levels.

By: Peggy Kane

Peggy Kane — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:18:47 +0000

I just put up a selection of reversals and evps which are at least a fair representation on my website.
I would suggest before calling this modality audio pareidolia, go take a listen to these. It’s just a tiny sampling and will only take a few moments.
Then you will have a little more upon which to base an opinion.

http://www.evpreversespeaking.com/2009/11/11/for-the-skeptical-but-open-minded-a-short-overview-of-reverse-speaking-and-evp/

By: Peggy Kane

Peggy Kane — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:13:39 +0000

I suspect that people who have paid a lot of money to be “smarter than the rest” would not like what they say to themselves in reverse. I’m sure they would shut down their own voice chastising them for their arrogance. I’ve been scolded a number of times myself in my own reverse, but I pay attention.

One has to put ego aside to get the benefits from reverse speaking. And that is a tall order.

Hard science is a kind of religion in itself. It has it doctrines and dogmas just like any other. It’s sort of the anti-religion religion.

Peer pressure is immense also, just like members of any religion, stray from the true path and look out. You’ll be a pariah and shunned.

When one no longer gives a damn about their image, nor will succumb to pressure, but is willing to climb into the rabbit hole equipped with a strong flashlight, well truth may just smile.

But you have to be willing to give up everything in the search for truth and that is often too much to ask of people.

Ridicule is easier and safer.

By: Ron H

Ron H — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:27:14 +0000

Peggy doesn’t make money off of her website or the information on it. What about you Phil?

Just read the first sentence on her site. “you are your greatest teacher” funny how so called smart people go through years of college and pay a lot of money to get a socially accepted piece of paper and call themselves smart. Yet won’t take a week to learn from themselves.

You actually see things in the sky you can’t explain. Why is that?

By: Peggy Kane

Peggy Kane — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:28:46 +0000

Phil is making fun of the idea of reverse speaking. But it is his reversals coming from his mind and mouth.

There is either some kind of global psychosis or there is validity to my discoveries. To simply ridicule it, is not scientific, it’s stupid.

Everyone reverses. No exceptions. To simply say it is all gibberish is putting one’s head in the sand. But one has to approach this with an open mind and that is extremely difficult for skeptics to do.

By: Peggy Kane

Peggy Kane — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:22:24 +0000

I reverse myself a lot. I check on what I hear and what I believe. If you heard bad things from me in reverse, well, so be it. I’ve put tons of audio up on my site for all to form their own opinions. You won’t hide anything in reverse.
.
The point is, there really is something to this.

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:05:17 +0000

Peggy,
You also sound funny in Reverse. You were saying some bad things about yourself in the reverse sound.

By: Peggy Kane

Peggy Kane — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:25:04 +0000

I realize this is an old thread and I also suspect that this post won’t be put up, but I’ll give it a try anyway.
.
That one little itty bitty reversal by Phil came from my website. Is that it? Is that your rebuttal Phil? One little itty bitty reversal? On my website, http://www.evpreversespeaking.com, I have about 15,000 along with several thousand recordings of evp (that’s electronic voice phenomena) from reptilian ETs and others interdimensionally and 650+ articles. (Of course as soon as I said reptilians there will be snickers. No real inquiry here, just gafaws!)
.
Is this how you do the research? You take one little itty bitty thing out of context and this becomes the basis for your argument?
If people go to my website and really do the research rather than dismissing it out of hand, they may see that there is something to this.
Blatant dismissal because of closed-minded prejudice is not “real” science. But then what is “real” science?
.
Does “real” science promote open-minded inquiry or is there a certain arrogance in the smug assumption that only what is experienced by the 5 senses is real?

Here is the link to that whole article with more reversals from both you, James Randi and finally a real prize from Michael Shermer.
Why don’t you let your skeptical readers listen to more?
.
http://www.evpreversespeaking.com/2009/07/01/the-amazing-randi-reversed-and-one-from-michael-shermer/

People should listen to Michael’s forward statement claiming our government doesn’t keep secrets. It’s hilarious.
His reversal about himself is even funnier.