<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Natural Mythology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:24:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tilth</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-50584</link>
		<dc:creator>Tilth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-50584</guid>
		<description>If you smoke, you should try it -- it&#039;s called American Spirit, by the way.  They produce excellent tobacco.

I&#039;m skeptical about the truth of their additive-free claims, though, if it&#039;s true, it matters.  As I understand it, tobacco companies add ingredients to their products which increase the user&#039;s absorption of nicotine, effectively making their cigarettes more addictive.  Some of the additives are harmful on their own, as well.

I will say that in my purely subjective, personal experience, it was a lot easier to quit smoking American Spirit tobacco than it was to quit smoking when I smoked Camels.  They were both addictive, but the level of addiction and power of withdrawal symptoms were completely different.  There could have been plenty of reasons for the difference, of course, but that&#039;s how it was for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you smoke, you should try it &#8212; it&#8217;s called American Spirit, by the way.  They produce excellent tobacco.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m skeptical about the truth of their additive-free claims, though, if it&#8217;s true, it matters.  As I understand it, tobacco companies add ingredients to their products which increase the user&#8217;s absorption of nicotine, effectively making their cigarettes more addictive.  Some of the additives are harmful on their own, as well.</p>
<p>I will say that in my purely subjective, personal experience, it was a lot easier to quit smoking American Spirit tobacco than it was to quit smoking when I smoked Camels.  They were both addictive, but the level of addiction and power of withdrawal symptoms were completely different.  There could have been plenty of reasons for the difference, of course, but that&#8217;s how it was for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtb004</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-20472</link>
		<dc:creator>jtb004</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-20472</guid>
		<description>The Chinese already had a longer lifespan than westerners so why should a system already in place show an improvement in the length of lifespan in the same length of time as a newly placed health system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese already had a longer lifespan than westerners so why should a system already in place show an improvement in the length of lifespan in the same length of time as a newly placed health system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-15828</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-15828</guid>
		<description>Well written post.

I&#039;d like to add that many of us will try alternative medicine because traditional medicine quite frankly does not have all the answers.  So  we research things, read alternative views promoted by actual physicians who recognize that there may be more than what can be seen, felt, or touched by a doctor.

Take for example &#039;idiopathic&#039; peripheral neuropathy.  In a young female without diabetes or MS.  Even though enjoying life and happy as a clam when the symptoms started, the doctor immediately questioned her mental health.  How fair is that?  Then the label of idiopathic is slapped on.  Said patient is told that she is no ones problem.  Hard to believe since something is causing this.  So she seeks out alternative treatments instead of continual doctor visits that are useless anyways.

Heartbreaking, yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written post.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to add that many of us will try alternative medicine because traditional medicine quite frankly does not have all the answers.  So  we research things, read alternative views promoted by actual physicians who recognize that there may be more than what can be seen, felt, or touched by a doctor.</p>
<p>Take for example &#8216;idiopathic&#8217; peripheral neuropathy.  In a young female without diabetes or MS.  Even though enjoying life and happy as a clam when the symptoms started, the doctor immediately questioned her mental health.  How fair is that?  Then the label of idiopathic is slapped on.  Said patient is told that she is no ones problem.  Hard to believe since something is causing this.  So she seeks out alternative treatments instead of continual doctor visits that are useless anyways.</p>
<p>Heartbreaking, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health blog</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-13259</link>
		<dc:creator>Health blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-13259</guid>
		<description>Lol ! I&#039;ll try the 100% natural ciggies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol ! I&#8217;ll try the 100% natural ciggies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflexology London</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-13258</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflexology London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-13258</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s all bonkers to be honest.
I have no fear of natural medecines making a comeback. It will never become a huge business but people need it.

Simply there are areas where medecine is powerless.
For example think about back ache, you know there aren&#039;t many drugs that can help you. Well you can get treated by an Osteopath for example. Now that&#039;s part of natural medecine even if it&#039;s not drugs.

Let&#039;s take the example of plants remedies. Let&#039;s pick &#039;stress&#039; as a symptom. St John Worth, Kava Kava and all of these herbs do work very well.

I disagree that plants/herbs are not labelled properly and that people do not know the side effects. Most common herbs are sold in the UK for example is shops with labels explaining use and potential side effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s all bonkers to be honest.<br />
I have no fear of natural medecines making a comeback. It will never become a huge business but people need it.</p>
<p>Simply there are areas where medecine is powerless.<br />
For example think about back ache, you know there aren&#8217;t many drugs that can help you. Well you can get treated by an Osteopath for example. Now that&#8217;s part of natural medecine even if it&#8217;s not drugs.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take the example of plants remedies. Let&#8217;s pick &#8216;stress&#8217; as a symptom. St John Worth, Kava Kava and all of these herbs do work very well.</p>
<p>I disagree that plants/herbs are not labelled properly and that people do not know the side effects. Most common herbs are sold in the UK for example is shops with labels explaining use and potential side effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10375</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10375</guid>
		<description>The reason &quot;Drugs&quot; have long lists of side effect is because they have been extensively studied. The FDA requires any &quot;Drug&quot; to list every possible side effect, however uncommon. There is also an extensive database with all the effects and possible negative effects of mixing with other drugs.

None of these &quot;Natural&quot; products have had any FDA approved testing, which is why they are not &quot;Drugs&quot;. So no one really knows what the side effects could be, how they interact with other drugs or &quot;Natural&quot; remedies, or even how much you should take to get any effect at all.

So be very careful when choosing &quot;Natural&quot; remedies, you really are taking your health into your own hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason &#8220;Drugs&#8221; have long lists of side effect is because they have been extensively studied. The FDA requires any &#8220;Drug&#8221; to list every possible side effect, however uncommon. There is also an extensive database with all the effects and possible negative effects of mixing with other drugs.</p>
<p>None of these &#8220;Natural&#8221; products have had any FDA approved testing, which is why they are not &#8220;Drugs&#8221;. So no one really knows what the side effects could be, how they interact with other drugs or &#8220;Natural&#8221; remedies, or even how much you should take to get any effect at all.</p>
<p>So be very careful when choosing &#8220;Natural&#8221; remedies, you really are taking your health into your own hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10372</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10372</guid>
		<description>Fewer ~any~ effects, is more accurate for most of these products...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fewer ~any~ effects, is more accurate for most of these products&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10335</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10335</guid>
		<description>Science is not the new religion, but I will agree that some people might think of it as such.

&quot;The uncertainty principle makes science actually unscientific&quot;, you say and you make no sense. That is precicely the point, science works on the best evidence available, not on faith or imposition. 

To take your chances with unproven natural remedies is really unscientific and dumb, knowing as we do that some natural remedies have never been effective and some are harmful. But that is your choice. Try to avoid Tuberculosis by natural means.

And, if &quot;Burgermeister’s charges include evidence&quot; it would be a hell of a story. Credible evidence, that is. Not TV Guide or Natural Enquirer type evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science is not the new religion, but I will agree that some people might think of it as such.</p>
<p>&#8220;The uncertainty principle makes science actually unscientific&#8221;, you say and you make no sense. That is precicely the point, science works on the best evidence available, not on faith or imposition. </p>
<p>To take your chances with unproven natural remedies is really unscientific and dumb, knowing as we do that some natural remedies have never been effective and some are harmful. But that is your choice. Try to avoid Tuberculosis by natural means.</p>
<p>And, if &#8220;Burgermeister’s charges include evidence&#8221; it would be a hell of a story. Credible evidence, that is. Not TV Guide or Natural Enquirer type evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Y.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10300</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10300</guid>
		<description>Just to point out how really dumb his argument is. People actually consume arsenic on purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to point out how really dumb his argument is. People actually consume arsenic on purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10140</link>
		<dc:creator>catgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/2009/07/20/3505/#comment-10140</guid>
		<description>How, exactly, do you kill a vitamin?  Do you mean denature?  If you do, that only applies to a few heat-sensitive vitamins.  If you get &quot;vitamin C&quot; or &quot;ascorbic acid&quot;, your body will not know the difference.  The molecule is the same no matter where it came from.  Also, do you even know what &quot;processing&quot; is?  Does cooking food in a factory &quot;kill&quot; more vitamins than cooking it in your kitchen (for the same time at the same temperature)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How, exactly, do you kill a vitamin?  Do you mean denature?  If you do, that only applies to a few heat-sensitive vitamins.  If you get &#8220;vitamin C&#8221; or &#8220;ascorbic acid&#8221;, your body will not know the difference.  The molecule is the same no matter where it came from.  Also, do you even know what &#8220;processing&#8221; is?  Does cooking food in a factory &#8220;kill&#8221; more vitamins than cooking it in your kitchen (for the same time at the same temperature)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

