<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ghost in a Bottle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillDarryl</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8308</link>
		<dc:creator>BillDarryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8308</guid>
		<description>This may be my favorite comment on a blog ever.

Nice?  Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be my favorite comment on a blog ever.</p>
<p>Nice?  Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillDarryl</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8307</link>
		<dc:creator>BillDarryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8307</guid>
		<description>&quot;Haunted Ham&quot; would be an awesome band name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Haunted Ham&#8221; would be an awesome band name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul T.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8300</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8300</guid>
		<description>Correction thank you Tonya not Tanya I don&#039;t even know who the hell that is! Nice title suggestion thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction thank you Tonya not Tanya I don&#8217;t even know who the hell that is! Nice title suggestion thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8293</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8293</guid>
		<description>If you write it, may I suggest &quot;The Radio of Spirit&quot; as a title?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you write it, may I suggest &#8220;The Radio of Spirit&#8221; as a title?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8291</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8291</guid>
		<description>I thought the article was okay, until I saw the picture of Senor Wences and Pedro.  Then I thought to myself, &#039;s&#039;aright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the article was okay, until I saw the picture of Senor Wences and Pedro.  Then I thought to myself, &#8216;s&#8217;aright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul T.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8287</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8287</guid>
		<description>Thinks Tanya, I&#039;m getting close I really am I have one other project to finish first. I&#039;m thinking of starting the book in the Victorian era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinks Tanya, I&#8217;m getting close I really am I have one other project to finish first. I&#8217;m thinking of starting the book in the Victorian era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyaK</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8278</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyaK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8278</guid>
		<description>Paul, I totally think you should write that book!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I totally think you should write that book!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul T.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8277</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 22:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8277</guid>
		<description>Nice blog Mark, when I was around 13 or 14 I built for myself a talking coffee can based on the same principles of simple inductive radio. I would do this cheesy Colombian voice saying that I was the spirit of some long gone coffee picker and my spirit was trapped in this can. In my years of researching this subject I came across a 1922 article from Popular Radio and fortunately the page is still archived on the web here&#039;s the link  http://earlyradiohistory.us/1922hou.htm  in it Houdini explains how mediums use inductive radio techniques to make not only teapots speak but also spirit trumpets or séance trumpets. It&#039;s well worth the read.

Another very rare electrical appliance for tapping into the great river of the dead, is a device known as William B. Lamont Spirit Telegraph, the backroom company was started sometime in the middle 50s we only know that it went bust somewhere around 1957. Nothing about this device could be more basic it was two D-cell batteries hooked to a telegraph key to initiate the spark for the telegraph key to strike there are two metal disks facing each other and of course the telegraph key will not strike unless there is  something conductive introduced to complete the circuit. According to the inventor that substance was ectoplasm, a mysterious ( and I&#039;m guessing conductive) material produced when spirits manifest themselves. The telegraph was intended to be used during  séances when the spirit appears the presence of ectoplasm would cause the telegraph key to strike. According to the hand written manual the spirit can be trained to answer yes or no questions. I won&#039;t go into the other inaccuracies of the manual here.

Recently some of these devices resurfaced it&#039;s very odd that the person who has the website treats this as new find, in my heyday of collecting antique photographs the complete history of the Spirit Telegraph hung out there like some kind of urban legend. Here is a link to that site http://www.mortlakemagic.com/spirit.htm since I have so much research material I&#039;ve been encouraged recently by many to put together a book on the history of spirit communication via electronic means, and to also try to put to rest some urban legends about Thomas Edison&#039;s alleged involvement in building a machine to talk to the dead.  But my wife says I cannot do this until she finishes her book on what it is like to live with a skeptic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog Mark, when I was around 13 or 14 I built for myself a talking coffee can based on the same principles of simple inductive radio. I would do this cheesy Colombian voice saying that I was the spirit of some long gone coffee picker and my spirit was trapped in this can. In my years of researching this subject I came across a 1922 article from Popular Radio and fortunately the page is still archived on the web here&#8217;s the link  <a href="http://earlyradiohistory.us/1922hou.htm" rel="nofollow">http://earlyradiohistory.us/1922hou.htm</a>  in it Houdini explains how mediums use inductive radio techniques to make not only teapots speak but also spirit trumpets or séance trumpets. It&#8217;s well worth the read.</p>
<p>Another very rare electrical appliance for tapping into the great river of the dead, is a device known as William B. Lamont Spirit Telegraph, the backroom company was started sometime in the middle 50s we only know that it went bust somewhere around 1957. Nothing about this device could be more basic it was two D-cell batteries hooked to a telegraph key to initiate the spark for the telegraph key to strike there are two metal disks facing each other and of course the telegraph key will not strike unless there is  something conductive introduced to complete the circuit. According to the inventor that substance was ectoplasm, a mysterious ( and I&#8217;m guessing conductive) material produced when spirits manifest themselves. The telegraph was intended to be used during  séances when the spirit appears the presence of ectoplasm would cause the telegraph key to strike. According to the hand written manual the spirit can be trained to answer yes or no questions. I won&#8217;t go into the other inaccuracies of the manual here.</p>
<p>Recently some of these devices resurfaced it&#8217;s very odd that the person who has the website treats this as new find, in my heyday of collecting antique photographs the complete history of the Spirit Telegraph hung out there like some kind of urban legend. Here is a link to that site <a href="http://www.mortlakemagic.com/spirit.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mortlakemagic.com/spirit.htm</a> since I have so much research material I&#8217;ve been encouraged recently by many to put together a book on the history of spirit communication via electronic means, and to also try to put to rest some urban legends about Thomas Edison&#8217;s alleged involvement in building a machine to talk to the dead.  But my wife says I cannot do this until she finishes her book on what it is like to live with a skeptic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llewelly</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8263</link>
		<dc:creator>llewelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8263</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I recently went through one of my old mentalist catalogues from a company that specialized in mediumistic stunts and props and was reminded that such gimmickry as “Telephones to the Dead” are nothing new.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Telephones? &lt;i&gt;Telephones?&lt;/i&gt; Today&#039;s youth want to know about sexting the dead, especially the sexting of virile vampires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I recently went through one of my old mentalist catalogues from a company that specialized in mediumistic stunts and props and was reminded that such gimmickry as “Telephones to the Dead” are nothing new.</p></blockquote>
<p>Telephones? <i>Telephones?</i> Today&#8217;s youth want to know about sexting the dead, especially the sexting of virile vampires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dax</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/30/ghost-in-a-bottle/#comment-8260</link>
		<dc:creator>Dax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 07:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2762#comment-8260</guid>
		<description>My brother is an amateur mentalist and show hypnotist (*), and it is sometimes just eerie how he can use cues and a basic understanding of human psychology to force a person to select a specific number, item, whatever. I guess I need to team up with him, kill both our consciences (why, why, why can&#039;t I just be an immoral, selfish, and rich fraud?), and make good money claiming we have mystic powers.

(*) Our secret? Show hypnosis is actually kinda fake: you actually abuse the person&#039;s ability to delude him or herself to conform with what is expected. It&#039;s just strange psychology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My brother is an amateur mentalist and show hypnotist (*), and it is sometimes just eerie how he can use cues and a basic understanding of human psychology to force a person to select a specific number, item, whatever. I guess I need to team up with him, kill both our consciences (why, why, why can&#8217;t I just be an immoral, selfish, and rich fraud?), and make good money claiming we have mystic powers.</p>
<p>(*) Our secret? Show hypnosis is actually kinda fake: you actually abuse the person&#8217;s ability to delude him or herself to conform with what is expected. It&#8217;s just strange psychology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

