<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solidarity is the Only Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jansob</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7548</link>
		<dc:creator>jansob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7548</guid>
		<description>This seems the perfect recipe to to drive away the &quot;proto-skeptics&quot; among them, those who are just beginning to question. If it&#039;s an anti-religion-make-fun-of-the-rubes fest, then you are clearly not interested in changing minds, but in slagging the believers.

((When a religious person (and there are a few) joins the skeptic community they expect the same “respect” they receive everyday in TRW, and are offended when they are given the same treatment that atheists receive daily in TRW. Its okay for atheists to be slandered and offended, but turn the table on the religious and you will hear them cry foul.))

So you see the believers who come to your group as the enemy already, and feel it&#039;s just payback to offend them? Keep in mind that if they have even shown up, they are not likely the people who slander and offend atheists.

It really sounds like you&#039;ve got an atheists group calling itself skeptical (not that it can&#039;t be both, but you should be clear on the point when people inquire...don&#039;t invite someone you know is a believer, make Stupid Christian jokes all night and then act all defensive when they don&#039;t come back).

To be honest, I&#039;m seeing the Skeptical Movement turning into the Libertarians in one way at least....a bunch of passionate people no one listens to because they can&#039;t relate to ideas that are not 100% coldly rational. (I&#039;m not saying we have to accept them, but we do have to understand where people are coming from). Religion is just so deeply baked into our culture it may be that it HAS to be a blind spot for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems the perfect recipe to to drive away the &#8220;proto-skeptics&#8221; among them, those who are just beginning to question. If it&#8217;s an anti-religion-make-fun-of-the-rubes fest, then you are clearly not interested in changing minds, but in slagging the believers.</p>
<p>((When a religious person (and there are a few) joins the skeptic community they expect the same “respect” they receive everyday in TRW, and are offended when they are given the same treatment that atheists receive daily in TRW. Its okay for atheists to be slandered and offended, but turn the table on the religious and you will hear them cry foul.))</p>
<p>So you see the believers who come to your group as the enemy already, and feel it&#8217;s just payback to offend them? Keep in mind that if they have even shown up, they are not likely the people who slander and offend atheists.</p>
<p>It really sounds like you&#8217;ve got an atheists group calling itself skeptical (not that it can&#8217;t be both, but you should be clear on the point when people inquire&#8230;don&#8217;t invite someone you know is a believer, make Stupid Christian jokes all night and then act all defensive when they don&#8217;t come back).</p>
<p>To be honest, I&#8217;m seeing the Skeptical Movement turning into the Libertarians in one way at least&#8230;.a bunch of passionate people no one listens to because they can&#8217;t relate to ideas that are not 100% coldly rational. (I&#8217;m not saying we have to accept them, but we do have to understand where people are coming from). Religion is just so deeply baked into our culture it may be that it HAS to be a blind spot for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeshua</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7337</guid>
		<description>I like your idea of being more actively skeptic, but i think some of the above posters are correct that trying to form a unified front may not be the best plan. I think better education and more individual action is key.

I used to just smile and stay silent when i lived at home and heard some woo woo nonsense from one of my religious relatives that came to visit. Now i never let such BS go without comment. [BTW, how can one be a real skeptic and believe in an invisible friend with absolutely no credible evidence to back his existence?]

I remember one time riding in a car with my brother-in-law and a mutual friend one night when our mutual friend, a grade-school teacher no less, looked up at the moon and announced, &quot;Did you know they&#039;ve discovered there are pyramids on the moon just like the ones in Egypt?&quot; My brother-in-law and i both had a good laugh. When i asked where he heard that, he said it was just common knowledge! He seemed surprised we didn&#039;t know about it. I think just speaking out is a big step forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your idea of being more actively skeptic, but i think some of the above posters are correct that trying to form a unified front may not be the best plan. I think better education and more individual action is key.</p>
<p>I used to just smile and stay silent when i lived at home and heard some woo woo nonsense from one of my religious relatives that came to visit. Now i never let such BS go without comment. [BTW, how can one be a real skeptic and believe in an invisible friend with absolutely no credible evidence to back his existence?]</p>
<p>I remember one time riding in a car with my brother-in-law and a mutual friend one night when our mutual friend, a grade-school teacher no less, looked up at the moon and announced, &#8220;Did you know they&#8217;ve discovered there are pyramids on the moon just like the ones in Egypt?&#8221; My brother-in-law and i both had a good laugh. When i asked where he heard that, he said it was just common knowledge! He seemed surprised we didn&#8217;t know about it. I think just speaking out is a big step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7056</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7056</guid>
		<description>Wrong.  Google for Hans Hoppe and &quot;argumentation ethics&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong.  Google for Hans Hoppe and &#8220;argumentation ethics&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Gerbic</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7055</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Gerbic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7055</guid>
		<description>Kitty are you advocating coming out of the closet?  As you well know there are many parallels to the gay community. Embracing words like skeptic, atheist, critical thinker and the like is another great step towards understanding and acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kitty are you advocating coming out of the closet?  As you well know there are many parallels to the gay community. Embracing words like skeptic, atheist, critical thinker and the like is another great step towards understanding and acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan G.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7054</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7054</guid>
		<description>Ditto the &quot;best response so far&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto the &#8220;best response so far&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan G.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7053</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7053</guid>
		<description>I agree completely with Ben! A very high percent of skeptics are atheists, considering our small community (relative to the religious population) we rarely meet like-minded people.  This means when we do meet another atheist we feel a strong kinship, and we usually bond.  All the years of watching what we say, looking over our shoulder to make sure no one is near, all that is just thrown out the window when you get a group of us together.  The mouths move and just about anything irrelevant might come out. 

I have experienced this many times over as I have formed a local skeptic group, and attend just about anything skeptic I can afford to attend.  It&#039;s like a anti-religion fest, finally you can be yourself, not that person who has to guard their words around work and family. Not sure how to explain this clearly, but skeptics and atheists are finally able to relax totally in the knowledge that you are unlikely to offend others.

When a religious person (and there are a few) joins the skeptic community they expect the same &quot;respect&quot; they receive everyday in TRW, and are offended when they are given the same treatment that atheists receive daily in TRW. Its okay for atheists to be slandered and offended, but turn the table on the religious and you will hear them cry foul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely with Ben! A very high percent of skeptics are atheists, considering our small community (relative to the religious population) we rarely meet like-minded people.  This means when we do meet another atheist we feel a strong kinship, and we usually bond.  All the years of watching what we say, looking over our shoulder to make sure no one is near, all that is just thrown out the window when you get a group of us together.  The mouths move and just about anything irrelevant might come out. </p>
<p>I have experienced this many times over as I have formed a local skeptic group, and attend just about anything skeptic I can afford to attend.  It&#8217;s like a anti-religion fest, finally you can be yourself, not that person who has to guard their words around work and family. Not sure how to explain this clearly, but skeptics and atheists are finally able to relax totally in the knowledge that you are unlikely to offend others.</p>
<p>When a religious person (and there are a few) joins the skeptic community they expect the same &#8220;respect&#8221; they receive everyday in TRW, and are offended when they are given the same treatment that atheists receive daily in TRW. Its okay for atheists to be slandered and offended, but turn the table on the religious and you will hear them cry foul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitty</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7044</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7044</guid>
		<description>Well it&#039;s not only being united, it&#039;s also waking and asking &quot;what can I do?&quot;  Not just reading and attending stuff, but taking real action.  Living your skeptic and critical thinking beliefs, and being known as &quot;a skeptic&quot; by your friends and coworkers.  Making being a skeptic a part of who you are and being open and proud of it, will make a big difference.  I&#039;m known as the &quot;Skeptic&quot; where I work and people will ask me &quot;well what do YOU think?&quot;.  Speaking up and taking action is a good first step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s not only being united, it&#8217;s also waking and asking &#8220;what can I do?&#8221;  Not just reading and attending stuff, but taking real action.  Living your skeptic and critical thinking beliefs, and being known as &#8220;a skeptic&#8221; by your friends and coworkers.  Making being a skeptic a part of who you are and being open and proud of it, will make a big difference.  I&#8217;m known as the &#8220;Skeptic&#8221; where I work and people will ask me &#8220;well what do YOU think?&#8221;.  Speaking up and taking action is a good first step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Loxton</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7038</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Loxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 21:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7038</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m all for seeing the existing skeptics groups settle on a set of core concerns. I&#039;ve made my pitch for what these should be (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.com/downloads/WhereDoWeGoFromHere.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Where Do We Go From Here?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;), and I think you and I agree on these: skepticism should be about testable claims in the realms of pseudoscience and the paranormal.

The funny thing is, the big skeptics groups already agree as well. The Skeptics Society, CSI, and JREF are all officially apolitical, are all officially concerned with testable claims, and all officially without any mandate to promote atheism. 

So, in that sense, the skeptical movement already has a unified mission. The next problem is really to get the supporters (and leaders) of each organization to stick to the existing mandate, and to better define the boundaries between these and parallel organizations (such as the CSI&#039;s sister organizations at the CFI, which are concerned with atheism and humanism).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m all for seeing the existing skeptics groups settle on a set of core concerns. I&#8217;ve made my pitch for what these should be (see <a href="http://www.skeptic.com/downloads/WhereDoWeGoFromHere.pdf" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Where Do We Go From Here?&#8221;</a>), and I think you and I agree on these: skepticism should be about testable claims in the realms of pseudoscience and the paranormal.</p>
<p>The funny thing is, the big skeptics groups already agree as well. The Skeptics Society, CSI, and JREF are all officially apolitical, are all officially concerned with testable claims, and all officially without any mandate to promote atheism. </p>
<p>So, in that sense, the skeptical movement already has a unified mission. The next problem is really to get the supporters (and leaders) of each organization to stick to the existing mandate, and to better define the boundaries between these and parallel organizations (such as the CSI&#8217;s sister organizations at the CFI, which are concerned with atheism and humanism).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7035</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7035</guid>
		<description>Everybody:
Yes I know what I have advocated is a very tall order. But as some have noted, a general &quot;clearing house&quot; concept or plan is what I think we need. Fighting a collaborative effort to unite the basic precepts we can all agree on is the thing: fake psychics, medical quackery,fraudulant mediums and those areas of obvious nonsense the public should be made aware of. These are certain areas we all agree upon, right? By incorporating a central &quot;agency&quot; or leading edge to winnow out those blatant issues, more time and energy could be focused to exert some push on the media on a daily basis. The other &quot;touchy&quot; matters that seem to be so contentious and separate us: religion, atheism, politics, Libertarianism and any other issues that are not sufficiantly centered on outright fraud could be housed in some other department where people versed in those specific areas could hold their own in what ever ways are decided by vote or committee. 
There will still be smaller groups no matter what the larger entities morph into. That&#039;s healthy. At some point they could concievably be absorbed or flow into the Mother Ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody:<br />
Yes I know what I have advocated is a very tall order. But as some have noted, a general &#8220;clearing house&#8221; concept or plan is what I think we need. Fighting a collaborative effort to unite the basic precepts we can all agree on is the thing: fake psychics, medical quackery,fraudulant mediums and those areas of obvious nonsense the public should be made aware of. These are certain areas we all agree upon, right? By incorporating a central &#8220;agency&#8221; or leading edge to winnow out those blatant issues, more time and energy could be focused to exert some push on the media on a daily basis. The other &#8220;touchy&#8221; matters that seem to be so contentious and separate us: religion, atheism, politics, Libertarianism and any other issues that are not sufficiantly centered on outright fraud could be housed in some other department where people versed in those specific areas could hold their own in what ever ways are decided by vote or committee.<br />
There will still be smaller groups no matter what the larger entities morph into. That&#8217;s healthy. At some point they could concievably be absorbed or flow into the Mother Ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/05/09/solidarity-is-the-only-way/#comment-7017</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2481#comment-7017</guid>
		<description>So I was wondering where the anti-smoking organizations get money to run anti-smoking ads. Apparently, from the tobacco companies, as part of the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_Master_Settlement_Agreement</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I was wondering where the anti-smoking organizations get money to run anti-smoking ads. Apparently, from the tobacco companies, as part of the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_Master_Settlement_Agreement" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_Master_Settlement_Agreement</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

