<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box of Fiends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-28465</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-28465</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re actually occupied with dog potty grass, I&#039;m certain you may find this http://hubpages.com/hub/Dog-Potty-Grass article helpful as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re actually occupied with dog potty grass, I&#8217;m certain you may find this <a href="http://hubpages.com/hub/Dog-Potty-Grass" rel="nofollow">http://hubpages.com/hub/Dog-Potty-Grass</a> article helpful as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-13858</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-13858</guid>
		<description>I bet my husband would love to talk to anyone about this...My husband worked with Chris Moon A.k.a Christopher Huff &quot;Moon&quot; with his Ghost Hunter Magazine/Haunted Times.  I am just sick to my stomach with all this FRAUD that is going on.  I lost my sister in April and for some FOOL to charge the money that HE is charging to talk to people who have crossed over...and only HE can understand it..hes the chosen one right? HA HA HA!  People who charge to talk to loved ones who have crossed over..what a joke. Email me....we can share some great stories about this fraud going on.. krissillygirl@hotmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet my husband would love to talk to anyone about this&#8230;My husband worked with Chris Moon A.k.a Christopher Huff &#8220;Moon&#8221; with his Ghost Hunter Magazine/Haunted Times.  I am just sick to my stomach with all this FRAUD that is going on.  I lost my sister in April and for some FOOL to charge the money that HE is charging to talk to people who have crossed over&#8230;and only HE can understand it..hes the chosen one right? HA HA HA!  People who charge to talk to loved ones who have crossed over..what a joke. Email me&#8230;.we can share some great stories about this fraud going on.. <a href="mailto:krissillygirl@hotmail.com">krissillygirl@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwen</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-7997</link>
		<dc:creator>gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-7997</guid>
		<description>I just can&#039;t believe all of the woo that this post generated!!!
*sigh* spirits don&#039;t exist...end of sentence.
To say they don&#039;t speak is to admit they might exist.
*sigh* spirits don&#039;t exist.
Just because scientist did not initially believe a theory that was later found to be correct still doesn&#039;t make 2+2=4,689765 plausible.
Science is about FALSIFIABILITY! How can you falsify the existence of &#039;spirits&#039; that are impossible by the current laws of physics?
duh!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t believe all of the woo that this post generated!!!<br />
*sigh* spirits don&#8217;t exist&#8230;end of sentence.<br />
To say they don&#8217;t speak is to admit they might exist.<br />
*sigh* spirits don&#8217;t exist.<br />
Just because scientist did not initially believe a theory that was later found to be correct still doesn&#8217;t make 2+2=4,689765 plausible.<br />
Science is about FALSIFIABILITY! How can you falsify the existence of &#8216;spirits&#8217; that are impossible by the current laws of physics?<br />
duh!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeshua</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-7806</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-7806</guid>
		<description>Just a small note to Glenn. I am surprised that no one else picked up on the fact that has not been proved that time travel is not possible. Einstein&#039;s theory of relativity allows for the possibility. Not that i&#039;ll be getting into any device made by the likes of Sharon and Frank, or anyone else with such poor writing skills and illogical reasoning!

Kirsten, your faith in Uri is sorely misplaced. He was thoroughly, embarrassingly and famously debunked by Johnny Carson on the Tonight Show, which you can look up on Youtube. Johnny bent over backwards to make the test fair and put poor Uri at ease, but he failed spectacularly, spouting excuses that sounded a good bit like those of Sharon and Frank.

And for Kabol, i believe the NT has an even earlier version of &quot;people who live in grass houses should not stow thrones.&quot; Although it comes from a story believed to be a late addition, it does say something like &quot;let he who is without sin cast the first stone.&quot; 

Best joke so far: My toaster can&#039;t be trusted because it says the first thing that pops up. ROFL! Best point so far: no one has even proved the existence of spirits, so attempting to communicate with them may be a little premature.

Finally, there is something to be said for gathering useful information from random noise, though it doesn&#039;t involve any woo woo as far i know. Sometimes it helps me write music by listening to the sound of loud machinery, but i never imagined it to be spirits communicating with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a small note to Glenn. I am surprised that no one else picked up on the fact that has not been proved that time travel is not possible. Einstein&#8217;s theory of relativity allows for the possibility. Not that i&#8217;ll be getting into any device made by the likes of Sharon and Frank, or anyone else with such poor writing skills and illogical reasoning!</p>
<p>Kirsten, your faith in Uri is sorely misplaced. He was thoroughly, embarrassingly and famously debunked by Johnny Carson on the Tonight Show, which you can look up on Youtube. Johnny bent over backwards to make the test fair and put poor Uri at ease, but he failed spectacularly, spouting excuses that sounded a good bit like those of Sharon and Frank.</p>
<p>And for Kabol, i believe the NT has an even earlier version of &#8220;people who live in grass houses should not stow thrones.&#8221; Although it comes from a story believed to be a late addition, it does say something like &#8220;let he who is without sin cast the first stone.&#8221; </p>
<p>Best joke so far: My toaster can&#8217;t be trusted because it says the first thing that pops up. ROFL! Best point so far: no one has even proved the existence of spirits, so attempting to communicate with them may be a little premature.</p>
<p>Finally, there is something to be said for gathering useful information from random noise, though it doesn&#8217;t involve any woo woo as far i know. Sometimes it helps me write music by listening to the sound of loud machinery, but i never imagined it to be spirits communicating with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rj</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-7127</link>
		<dc:creator>Rj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 14:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-7127</guid>
		<description>Charles - there is nothing wrong with theorizing and experimenting.  There is nothing wrong with having doubts and prejudices about what is scientifically true or not.  That is why the scientific method is so important: it allows for all these things, and encourages retesting, theory modification, peer review, and argument.  People are allowed to object when these kinds of elements are suppressed, when procedures are hidden, when claims are made without testing, and when anyone raising a discenting view is called a skeptic and dismissed. 

The best way to be sure these experiences are true is not, as you said, to simply experiment yourself.  There is nothing wrong with that, but because it is very easy for even the most intelligent to fool themselves, misinterpret data, or be influenced by their own prejudice to BELIEVE, one must go beyond personal experiments, and involve peers, and non-believers, so that all subjectivity can be driven out of the testing, and in the end, the best theories can be confirmed, and the less so, dismissed.

While many EVP researchers are dipping their toe in the scientific method (they are collecting data, making observations, and theorizing), they never take the complete plunge, by following up with predictions and objective experiments, with peer review and publishing (beyond a circle of believers), and with theory modification or dismissal, when appropriate.

The most egregious not only ignore these elements, but charge the vulnerable money for services and &#039;readings&#039;, which are based on the prejudices and beliefs (or dishonesty) of the EVP practitioner.  This is why you see such outrage over EVP claims: not because of the research, but because of its abuse, and its damage to others.  This is more than a lack of knowledge in an unexplored area: this is an evil.

The English philosopher Edmund Burke said, ‘The only thing necessary for the triumph [of evil] is for good men to do nothing.’  In this case, and in this thread, good men are not willing to allow that evil to triumph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles &#8211; there is nothing wrong with theorizing and experimenting.  There is nothing wrong with having doubts and prejudices about what is scientifically true or not.  That is why the scientific method is so important: it allows for all these things, and encourages retesting, theory modification, peer review, and argument.  People are allowed to object when these kinds of elements are suppressed, when procedures are hidden, when claims are made without testing, and when anyone raising a discenting view is called a skeptic and dismissed. </p>
<p>The best way to be sure these experiences are true is not, as you said, to simply experiment yourself.  There is nothing wrong with that, but because it is very easy for even the most intelligent to fool themselves, misinterpret data, or be influenced by their own prejudice to BELIEVE, one must go beyond personal experiments, and involve peers, and non-believers, so that all subjectivity can be driven out of the testing, and in the end, the best theories can be confirmed, and the less so, dismissed.</p>
<p>While many EVP researchers are dipping their toe in the scientific method (they are collecting data, making observations, and theorizing), they never take the complete plunge, by following up with predictions and objective experiments, with peer review and publishing (beyond a circle of believers), and with theory modification or dismissal, when appropriate.</p>
<p>The most egregious not only ignore these elements, but charge the vulnerable money for services and &#8216;readings&#8217;, which are based on the prejudices and beliefs (or dishonesty) of the EVP practitioner.  This is why you see such outrage over EVP claims: not because of the research, but because of its abuse, and its damage to others.  This is more than a lack of knowledge in an unexplored area: this is an evil.</p>
<p>The English philosopher Edmund Burke said, ‘The only thing necessary for the triumph [of evil] is for good men to do nothing.’  In this case, and in this thread, good men are not willing to allow that evil to triumph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-7059</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-7059</guid>
		<description>I have just read you article and I found some interesting comments especially about Chris Moon. But I don&#039;t agree with everything, I let place to the doubt: pretendind being scepticals you still have prejudices about what is true or not.Science especially with physic since Albert Einstein have made tremendous changes(he would have been considered like mad during the mid 1800&#039;s)  and may give soon or later an explanation to those kind of phenomenas (parallel worlds, other dimensions). The best way to be sure if those kind of experiences are true or not  is to experiment yourself without fear of being a fool and with an open mind, without prejudices from on side or another. I have personnaly tried EVP, i had something really strange on my cassette but i had no evidence that it was a pirit talking to me.nevertheless it must interesting to go on and try to get new results, but I wont let other people than myself do the job for me in order to be 100% secure of the result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just read you article and I found some interesting comments especially about Chris Moon. But I don&#8217;t agree with everything, I let place to the doubt: pretendind being scepticals you still have prejudices about what is true or not.Science especially with physic since Albert Einstein have made tremendous changes(he would have been considered like mad during the mid 1800&#8242;s)  and may give soon or later an explanation to those kind of phenomenas (parallel worlds, other dimensions). The best way to be sure if those kind of experiences are true or not  is to experiment yourself without fear of being a fool and with an open mind, without prejudices from on side or another. I have personnaly tried EVP, i had something really strange on my cassette but i had no evidence that it was a pirit talking to me.nevertheless it must interesting to go on and try to get new results, but I wont let other people than myself do the job for me in order to be 100% secure of the result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose the Paranormal Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-6910</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose the Paranormal Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 11:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-6910</guid>
		<description>Ouch!

&quot;Over $3,000 given away in grants for upcoming paranormal inventors!&quot;

Sounds like a bunkfest! I have a feather duster that can open portals to other dimensions! That $3000 prize money is as good as mine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch!</p>
<p>&#8220;Over $3,000 given away in grants for upcoming paranormal inventors!&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like a bunkfest! I have a feather duster that can open portals to other dimensions! That $3000 prize money is as good as mine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose the Paranormal Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-6908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose the Paranormal Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-6908</guid>
		<description>&quot;are too afraid to research anything themselves&quot; - Frank, I&#039;ve used these useless devices. I have one in my possession. I can honestly tell you that any device that is alleged to contact the dead is nothing more than bunk. Define research please.

&quot;That’s what medicine, and the drug cartels use to get what ever result they want!&quot; - let&#039;s not forget scientific method(s) are also responsible for the electricity powering your bunk device. The internet you exploit to sell your bunk. The TV you watch your favorite Ghost Hunting shows that promote your bunk. The radio stations that populate the airwaves that give your bunk its &quot;voices&quot;..etc etc. There&#039;s a lot to scientific method(s) you&#039;re ignoring,

&quot;I’m nor looking for any thruth&quot; - that much is obvious.

&quot;Friggin’ skeptics, just a bunch of egotistical little dweebs that don’t have a life,&quot; - Amusing! Coming from people who sit and talk to their broken radios and put themselves up on a pedestal of self righteousness.

&quot;you’d rather have some dork tell you what’s safe to believe&quot; - as opposed to believing you right? Hmmm?

&quot;You can’t even consider any possiblities wihtout checking with some other authority!&quot; - Wait, didn&#039;t you just mention we&#039;re too afraid to do research? Poor Frank. You&#039;re spending too much time alone with your broken radio.

&quot;I don’t believe in hauntings&quot; - Yes Frank. We can see that belief in &quot;ghosts&quot; is something you definitely don&#039;t have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;are too afraid to research anything themselves&#8221; &#8211; Frank, I&#8217;ve used these useless devices. I have one in my possession. I can honestly tell you that any device that is alleged to contact the dead is nothing more than bunk. Define research please.</p>
<p>&#8220;That’s what medicine, and the drug cartels use to get what ever result they want!&#8221; &#8211; let&#8217;s not forget scientific method(s) are also responsible for the electricity powering your bunk device. The internet you exploit to sell your bunk. The TV you watch your favorite Ghost Hunting shows that promote your bunk. The radio stations that populate the airwaves that give your bunk its &#8220;voices&#8221;..etc etc. There&#8217;s a lot to scientific method(s) you&#8217;re ignoring,</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m nor looking for any thruth&#8221; &#8211; that much is obvious.</p>
<p>&#8220;Friggin’ skeptics, just a bunch of egotistical little dweebs that don’t have a life,&#8221; &#8211; Amusing! Coming from people who sit and talk to their broken radios and put themselves up on a pedestal of self righteousness.</p>
<p>&#8220;you’d rather have some dork tell you what’s safe to believe&#8221; &#8211; as opposed to believing you right? Hmmm?</p>
<p>&#8220;You can’t even consider any possiblities wihtout checking with some other authority!&#8221; &#8211; Wait, didn&#8217;t you just mention we&#8217;re too afraid to do research? Poor Frank. You&#8217;re spending too much time alone with your broken radio.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t believe in hauntings&#8221; &#8211; Yes Frank. We can see that belief in &#8220;ghosts&#8221; is something you definitely don&#8217;t have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kabol</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-6803</link>
		<dc:creator>kabol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-6803</guid>
		<description>sorry, fish and birds are dinner, not pets.

and if you&#039;re from the southern US, a whole bunch of other critters are dinner and not pets.  well, i was thinking reptiles - but they&#039;re actually pretty evenly distributed between dinner and pets.  no, no -- more dinner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, fish and birds are dinner, not pets.</p>
<p>and if you&#8217;re from the southern US, a whole bunch of other critters are dinner and not pets.  well, i was thinking reptiles &#8211; but they&#8217;re actually pretty evenly distributed between dinner and pets.  no, no &#8212; more dinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan G.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/04/25/box-of-fiends/#comment-6787</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=2199#comment-6787</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll ask my fridge if its heard anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll ask my fridge if its heard anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

