<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Your Sacred Cow?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-4917</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-4917</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Max that free will is a useful illusion but i think it comforts us to believe in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Max that free will is a useful illusion but i think it comforts us to believe in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-3366</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-3366</guid>
		<description>Nobody explicitly mentioned political correctness. I don&#039;t trust politically correct scientific conclusions, because there&#039;s a bias against politically incorrect findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody explicitly mentioned political correctness. I don&#8217;t trust politically correct scientific conclusions, because there&#8217;s a bias against politically incorrect findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Rodemsky</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-3360</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rodemsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-3360</guid>
		<description>Atheism. It would take a lot to convince me there is ANY intelligent force in the universe, much less the Christian god.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atheism. It would take a lot to convince me there is ANY intelligent force in the universe, much less the Christian god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott D.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-3349</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-3349</guid>
		<description>I believe people have free-will.  I&#039;ll probably continue to believe I have free will even if it&#039;s shown to be an illusion. 
Though if that happens I&#039;d have no choice in the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe people have free-will.  I&#8217;ll probably continue to believe I have free will even if it&#8217;s shown to be an illusion.<br />
Though if that happens I&#8217;d have no choice in the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-3345</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-3345</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t have a sacred cow, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t have a sacred cow, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blind Watchmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blind Watchmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>Some &quot;superstitions&quot; are really just cultural rituals that make people feel part of a group. We do things for &quot;good luck&quot;, knowing deep down that it is ridiculous and we don&#039;t really expect good things to happen just because we did the ritual. 

In college, we would touch the school statue while walking to a game &quot;for luck&quot;. I still feel the urge to do this, but I don&#039;t think for a minute that it will really alter an outcome. I guess one could consider this my &quot;sacred cow&quot;.

Sometimes, superstitious gestures are just ways of communicating. When someone tells me about how healthy their grandmother is, I might might knock on some wood. Again, I don&#039;t think for a minute that this gesture will actually keep Granny healthy. I simply communitcated that I hope that she stays healthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some &#8220;superstitions&#8221; are really just cultural rituals that make people feel part of a group. We do things for &#8220;good luck&#8221;, knowing deep down that it is ridiculous and we don&#8217;t really expect good things to happen just because we did the ritual. </p>
<p>In college, we would touch the school statue while walking to a game &#8220;for luck&#8221;. I still feel the urge to do this, but I don&#8217;t think for a minute that it will really alter an outcome. I guess one could consider this my &#8220;sacred cow&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sometimes, superstitious gestures are just ways of communicating. When someone tells me about how healthy their grandmother is, I might might knock on some wood. Again, I don&#8217;t think for a minute that this gesture will actually keep Granny healthy. I simply communitcated that I hope that she stays healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatherdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-3290</link>
		<dc:creator>fatherdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-3290</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have any superstitions. I don&#039;t have any sacred cows. I guess the one thing I can think of that I have provisionally accepted that would have you calling me a loon is plasma cosmology. I have not been able to find arguments that completely obliterates it, yet, although, I have found an explanation that counters an argument made against the big bang theory by plasma cosmology proponents. I heard Phil Plait say that his site had blown away the arguments for plasma cosmology, but, all I found was one argument that was a straw man. I am still looking, but, I haven&#039;t found an argument to make me accept that electromagnetic forces have no effect on an astronomical scale.

How&#039;s that? That is as close as I can get to an unbsubstantiated &quot;belief&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any superstitions. I don&#8217;t have any sacred cows. I guess the one thing I can think of that I have provisionally accepted that would have you calling me a loon is plasma cosmology. I have not been able to find arguments that completely obliterates it, yet, although, I have found an explanation that counters an argument made against the big bang theory by plasma cosmology proponents. I heard Phil Plait say that his site had blown away the arguments for plasma cosmology, but, all I found was one argument that was a straw man. I am still looking, but, I haven&#8217;t found an argument to make me accept that electromagnetic forces have no effect on an astronomical scale.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that? That is as close as I can get to an unbsubstantiated &#8220;belief&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmac57</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>tmac57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>My cow is a little nervous, but not scared!....Huh...it is? Ohhhh...never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My cow is a little nervous, but not scared!&#8230;.Huh&#8230;it is? Ohhhh&#8230;never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insanecarbonbasedlifeform</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>insanecarbonbasedlifeform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>So, over a hundred comments in, it&#039;s already been said, but I think the correct term is &quot;blind spot&quot;, not sacred cow. If I have something I&#039;m holding to dogmatically, it&#039;s a sacred cow, but at this point, I&#039;m  watching out for my blind spots that other people notice. If I don&#039;t allow something to be challenged, then it becomes a sacred cow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, over a hundred comments in, it&#8217;s already been said, but I think the correct term is &#8220;blind spot&#8221;, not sacred cow. If I have something I&#8217;m holding to dogmatically, it&#8217;s a sacred cow, but at this point, I&#8217;m  watching out for my blind spots that other people notice. If I don&#8217;t allow something to be challenged, then it becomes a sacred cow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahar Lubin</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/01/29/whats-your-sacred-cow/#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahar Lubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=1037#comment-3221</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll go with sports.

I don&#039;t care what the evidence might say, my rally towel is responsible for the phillies winning world series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll go with sports.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what the evidence might say, my rally towel is responsible for the phillies winning world series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

