There’s more than likely some truth to that which, as noted, tends to allude to intellectual hurdles being lowered for the USA market. But there are many cultural reasons also, many of which may suit the average audience member but not a skeptic.

I wonder if a key variable isn’t that USA skeptic, science and educational groups are openly and honestly highlighting the negative effect ‘Wedge strategists’ have had – particularly in the media – on science ['scientific materialism'] and in promoting the illusion ‘Darwinism’ is morally bankrupt, if not malignant.

In Australia science media [not drama] is reportedly digested by those with a workable knowledge of the scientific method – or what ‘science actually means/does’. That’s only 20%. And it follows expeditious funding requires shows be themed to keep their audience. But I’m not sure even some of our ‘premier’ shows are not a little dumbed down, as ‘reporting’ hasn’t been what I’d assume is for a science minded audience – perhaps even [gasp!] in the habit of checking source material.

The supposed format to avoid is blending popular lifestyle themes with science or reporting of scientific progress. Which I guess is a way of saying certain viewers don’t have the “viewing habits” to consume or benefit from scientific material.

As for discourse on drama shows like The Mentalist, which does interest Aussie skeptics, it’s presently drowned out by commercial coverage of the “gifts” of present visitor Jon Edward, persistent strange happenings and dusty old woo-woo for non ratings seasons.