<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prediction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shark Guys</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shark Guys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>Excellent. We&#039;ve quoted and linked to you in part two of our rundown on our list of 2008 Predictions that were Hilariously off the Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent. We&#8217;ve quoted and linked to you in part two of our rundown on our list of 2008 Predictions that were Hilariously off the Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldebabe</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>oldebabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Keep on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Glad to help!

It must be tough for figures like the Pope, the President, and the Fed Chairman. If they make their honest assessment of the situation public, the situation immediately changes. Especially when the situation is bad, sounding pessimistic can make it worse, but unwarranted optimism appears dishonest or self-delusional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to help!</p>
<p>It must be tough for figures like the Pope, the President, and the Fed Chairman. If they make their honest assessment of the situation public, the situation immediately changes. Especially when the situation is bad, sounding pessimistic can make it worse, but unwarranted optimism appears dishonest or self-delusional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Why a sealed envelope? Good question. I&#039;m glad you are paying attention! Without revealing any &quot;secret,&quot; (and there are many prediction routines out there)the psychic has to have something to &quot;work with.&quot; Get it? ...As in &quot;switch later&quot;.... Plenty of &quot;shut-eye&quot;* psychics annouce publicly, but it generally gets forgotten soon after that way. Sealing a prediction in an envelope and assigning it a specific date to be opened &quot;TBA&quot; lends itself to a more fromal presentation later, in front of the press, etc. 
As far as influencing the outcome, I suppose that could be a consideration if you were a demigod or someone really important like the Pope or Leno. I may use that concept as an excuse for using an envelope and sealing a prediction up in it one day, thanks. I knew this blog would lead to more great ideas!
Mark Edward
* a &quot;shut-eye&quot; in the vernacular of the &quot;psychic entertainer&quot; trade is an absolute believer in any occult or supernatural system: Big Foot, Elvis sightings, U.F.O&#039;s and just about anything you might hear on &quot;Coast to Coasrt.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why a sealed envelope? Good question. I&#8217;m glad you are paying attention! Without revealing any &#8220;secret,&#8221; (and there are many prediction routines out there)the psychic has to have something to &#8220;work with.&#8221; Get it? &#8230;As in &#8220;switch later&#8221;&#8230;. Plenty of &#8220;shut-eye&#8221;* psychics annouce publicly, but it generally gets forgotten soon after that way. Sealing a prediction in an envelope and assigning it a specific date to be opened &#8220;TBA&#8221; lends itself to a more fromal presentation later, in front of the press, etc.<br />
As far as influencing the outcome, I suppose that could be a consideration if you were a demigod or someone really important like the Pope or Leno. I may use that concept as an excuse for using an envelope and sealing a prediction up in it one day, thanks. I knew this blog would lead to more great ideas!<br />
Mark Edward<br />
* a &#8220;shut-eye&#8221; in the vernacular of the &#8220;psychic entertainer&#8221; trade is an absolute believer in any occult or supernatural system: Big Foot, Elvis sightings, U.F.O&#8217;s and just about anything you might hear on &#8220;Coast to Coasrt.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalemika</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalemika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-526</guid>
		<description>http://www.tmz.com/2008/11/05/deftones-bassist-cheng-in-coma-after-crash/

Close enough, right? Just a horizontal fall!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2008/11/05/deftones-bassist-cheng-in-coma-after-crash/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tmz.com/2008/11/05/deftones-bassist-cheng-in-coma-after-crash/</a></p>
<p>Close enough, right? Just a horizontal fall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s gonna take this one woots. But anyways ya I hope your right bro because there isn&#039;t enough people falling from high places and breaking there knee-caps these days</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s gonna take this one woots. But anyways ya I hope your right bro because there isn&#8217;t enough people falling from high places and breaking there knee-caps these days</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-512</guid>
		<description>&quot;McCain 510 Electoral Votes, Obama 28 ... How the Map Looked Exactly 2 Years Ago&quot;

http://www.surveyusa.com/index.php/2008/11/03/mccain-510-electoral-votes-ob=ama-28-how-the-map-looked-exactly-2-years-ago/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McCain 510 Electoral Votes, Obama 28 &#8230; How the Map Looked Exactly 2 Years Ago&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/index.php/2008/11/03/mccain-510-electoral-votes-ob=ama-28-how-the-map-looked-exactly-2-years-ago/" rel="nofollow">http://www.surveyusa.com/index.php/2008/11/03/mccain-510-electoral-votes-ob=ama-28-how-the-map-looked-exactly-2-years-ago/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-510</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the excuse given for sealing the prediction in an envelope rather than announcing it publicly? To prevent it from influencing the outcome?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the excuse given for sealing the prediction in an envelope rather than announcing it publicly? To prevent it from influencing the outcome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillDarryl</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>BillDarryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-506</guid>
		<description>In August of 2000, Kreskin went on the Howard Stern show, and made a big show out of putting his presidential election prediction in a safe to stay at Stern&#039;s studio until November.  He was booked to come in the day after the election and promised the reveal at that time.

Of course, by 6 AM the morning after the election, America still had no decision on the winner (Florida was uncalled).  Stern began his show salivating, &quot;I can&#039;t WAIT for Kreskin to show up.&quot;

Sure enough, first Kreskin tried to call in and postpone the appearance, which Stern would not allow.  Then he came in, and went through every weasely excuse he could to not open the safe.  Stern &amp; co. had a great time calling him out on his complete and total BS.

The safe was not opened that day.  Don&#039;t know if it ever was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In August of 2000, Kreskin went on the Howard Stern show, and made a big show out of putting his presidential election prediction in a safe to stay at Stern&#8217;s studio until November.  He was booked to come in the day after the election and promised the reveal at that time.</p>
<p>Of course, by 6 AM the morning after the election, America still had no decision on the winner (Florida was uncalled).  Stern began his show salivating, &#8220;I can&#8217;t WAIT for Kreskin to show up.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure enough, first Kreskin tried to call in and postpone the appearance, which Stern would not allow.  Then he came in, and went through every weasely excuse he could to not open the safe.  Stern &amp; co. had a great time calling him out on his complete and total BS.</p>
<p>The safe was not opened that day.  Don&#8217;t know if it ever was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjohn756</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/04/prediction/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>bigjohn756</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=300#comment-505</guid>
		<description>The Magician&#039;s Choice won&#039;t work if you give away the fact that you have two safes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Magician&#8217;s Choice won&#8217;t work if you give away the fact that you have two safes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

