<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SkepticBlog Comment Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-61218</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-61218</guid>
		<description>Can anyone recommend some good 
books for a beginning (skeptic) to 
read?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone recommend some good<br />
books for a beginning (skeptic) to<br />
read?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Mishenko</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-25269</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Mishenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 03:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-25269</guid>
		<description>According to the Ethnographic Atlas Codebook, of 1231 societies noted:
Number	       Percent	                   Practice
186	        15.1%	                    Monogamy
453	        36.8%	                     Occasional polygyny
588	        47.8%	                     Frequent polygyny
4	        0.3%	                     Polyandry
		
1045	        84.9%	                      Non Monogamous

http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/worldcul/Codebook4EthnoAtlas.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Ethnographic Atlas Codebook, of 1231 societies noted:<br />
Number	       Percent	                   Practice<br />
186	        15.1%	                    Monogamy<br />
453	        36.8%	                     Occasional polygyny<br />
588	        47.8%	                     Frequent polygyny<br />
4	        0.3%	                     Polyandry</p>
<p>1045	        84.9%	                      Non Monogamous</p>
<p><a href="http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/worldcul/Codebook4EthnoAtlas.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/worldcul/Codebook4EthnoAtlas.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew ronson</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-20083</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew ronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-20083</guid>
		<description>Having read through these  guidelines  and the responses it surprised me that no one seemed to consider the term &quot;Piss off&quot; vulgar  or inappropriate.  Only  In recent  months have I come to accept it.

More important, after being advised to read these guidelines I  wonder if I will now find my comments have been accepted, and if not when might I accept them to be,(in days or hours)?  and do they get &quot;edited&quot; or just omitted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read through these  guidelines  and the responses it surprised me that no one seemed to consider the term &#8220;Piss off&#8221; vulgar  or inappropriate.  Only  In recent  months have I come to accept it.</p>
<p>More important, after being advised to read these guidelines I  wonder if I will now find my comments have been accepted, and if not when might I accept them to be,(in days or hours)?  and do they get &#8220;edited&#8221; or just omitted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-19942</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-19942</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sincerely impressed by the language skills, application of reason and relatively polite tone on these blogs.  I may hang around awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sincerely impressed by the language skills, application of reason and relatively polite tone on these blogs.  I may hang around awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drawoc Suomynona Na</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-16575</link>
		<dc:creator>Drawoc Suomynona Na</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-16575</guid>
		<description>And apparently it was, because the comment didn&#039;t go through here either... unless I spelled my username &lt;I&gt;backwards&lt;/I&gt;.  O... kay then.

Judging by the &quot;spam-catching&quot; message, you&#039;re using WP-SpamFree, aren&#039;t you?  &lt;I&gt;Hate&lt;/I&gt; that thing with a passion.  There&#039;s something about my writing style that makes it mistake many of my posts for spam (on other sites; haven&#039;t posted here before), and it&#039;s sometimes like pulling teeth for me to get a comment through.  Not sure what it is about my comments that sets it off...  Ah well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And apparently it was, because the comment didn&#8217;t go through here either&#8230; unless I spelled my username <i>backwards</i>.  O&#8230; kay then.</p>
<p>Judging by the &#8220;spam-catching&#8221; message, you&#8217;re using WP-SpamFree, aren&#8217;t you?  <i>Hate</i> that thing with a passion.  There&#8217;s something about my writing style that makes it mistake many of my posts for spam (on other sites; haven&#8217;t posted here before), and it&#8217;s sometimes like pulling teeth for me to get a comment through.  Not sure what it is about my comments that sets it off&#8230;  Ah well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drawoc Suomynona Na</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-16574</link>
		<dc:creator>Drawoc Suomynona Na</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-16574</guid>
		<description>Okay, I&#039;m trying to post a comment in another thread, and keep getting flagged as spam (it&#039;s not).  Testing here with a very short link-free post to see if maybe it&#039;s the username that gets me flagged...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;m trying to post a comment in another thread, and keep getting flagged as spam (it&#8217;s not).  Testing here with a very short link-free post to see if maybe it&#8217;s the username that gets me flagged&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmac57</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-12195</link>
		<dc:creator>tmac57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-12195</guid>
		<description>There have been several times now that when I include a link to another website (usually neurologica or science based medicine),that the comment either takes an extremely long time to show up, or never shows up at all. Am I doing something wrnog? I see comments all over the blog with links, so I can&#039;t see where that would be an issue.Also, this did not use to happen, this has been a fairly recent development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been several times now that when I include a link to another website (usually neurologica or science based medicine),that the comment either takes an extremely long time to show up, or never shows up at all. Am I doing something wrnog? I see comments all over the blog with links, so I can&#8217;t see where that would be an issue.Also, this did not use to happen, this has been a fairly recent development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kavi</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-8778</link>
		<dc:creator>Kavi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-8778</guid>
		<description>OK, so, Feralboy (post #20) is a troll, right? The name kind of gives it away. HobbitEater would have been better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so, Feralboy (post #20) is a troll, right? The name kind of gives it away. HobbitEater would have been better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feralboy</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-5172</link>
		<dc:creator>Feralboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-5172</guid>
		<description>I have noticed my comments disappearing more than once despite not violating any rules.  This has left me very skeptical regarding the worth of your website.  Goodbye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed my comments disappearing more than once despite not violating any rules.  This has left me very skeptical regarding the worth of your website.  Goodbye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul D. Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticblog.org/2008/11/03/skepticblog-comment-policy/#comment-4587</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul D. Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=265#comment-4587</guid>
		<description>Maybe some of the vagueness of the comments policy could be relieved by giving us some examples of what is not allowed. It would be both instructive and entertaining. Oh Please. What could be better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe some of the vagueness of the comments policy could be relieved by giving us some examples of what is not allowed. It would be both instructive and entertaining. Oh Please. What could be better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

